Skip to content

Conversation

frewsxcv and others added 23 commits June 22, 2016 08:24
"boostrap" instead of "bootstrap"
The macro gets used to create a mapping of identifiers to names and their
associated functions. Since it creates a table of language items, let's rename
it in a similar manner to how vec! creates a vec.
Improve diagnostics E0425: `use` (public) name

E0425: unresolved name
Add example for `std::thread::sleep`.

None
Parameters in doc comment should be formatted code-like.

None
Fix typo in bootstrap README

"boostrap" instead of "bootstrap"
Switched tense to clarify what is happening in the example
Fix typo in future incompatible lint

Found in release triage.
Indicate how the `JoinHandle` struct is created.

None
…ame, r=jseyfried

Renames "lets_do_this" macro more appropriately.

The macro gets used to create a mapping of identifiers to names and their
associated functions. Since it creates a table of language items, let's rename
it in a similar manner to how vec! creates a vec.
…illaumeGomez

Add doc example for `std::thread::Builder::name`.

None
Add hyperlinks to `std::fs` functions from `std::path`.

None
…meGomez

Indicate how the `std::path::Components` struct is created.

None
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=10

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 25, 2016

📌 Commit a4a4f1f has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 25, 2016

⌛ Testing commit a4a4f1f with merge 2c7c48a...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 25, 2016

💔 Test failed - auto-win-gnu-32-opt-rustbuild

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup branch June 25, 2016 18:23
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rollup A PR which is a rollup

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants