Skip to content

Remove last traces of BitV and BitVSet from documentation #22643

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2015

Conversation

fhartwig
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like a few spots in the documentation were missed when renaming Bitv and BitvSet. This fixes the docs to use their current names.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ b4dc9fd rollup

bombless added a commit to bombless/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2015
…hton

It looks like a few spots in the documentation were missed when renaming `Bitv` and `BitvSet`. This fixes the docs to use their current names.
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2015
…hton

 It looks like a few spots in the documentation were missed when renaming `Bitv` and `BitvSet`. This fixes the docs to use their current names.
@alexcrichton alexcrichton merged commit b4dc9fd into rust-lang:master Feb 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants