[WIP] Simplify the canonical enum clone branches to a copy statement

[dianqk]

No description provided.

[dianqk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

💔 Test for b4269e3 failed: CI. Failed jobs:

• try - dist-x86_64-linux (web logs, extended logs)

[dianqk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 673e3f6 (673e3f61f8b218d304147e821d485edf0ebf3b09, parent: 6501e64fcb02d22b49d6e59d10a7692ec8095619)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (673e3f6): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.7%	[0.7%, 0.7%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.4%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-2.4%, -0.1%]	6
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-1.3%, -0.1%]	17
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-2.4%, 0.7%]	7

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.8%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.8%	[1.9%, 4.3%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.8%	[1.9%, 4.3%]	3

Cycles

Results (primary -3.4%, secondary -2.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.5%	[2.5%, 2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.4%	[-3.4%, -3.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-4.5%, -2.1%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.4%	[-3.4%, -3.4%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary -0.1%, secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, -0.0%]	20
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.0%]	41
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.4%, 0.2%]	23

Bootstrap: 476.496s -> 474.095s (-0.50%)
Artifact size: 390.49 MiB -> 390.42 MiB (-0.02%)