identity uses are ok, even if there are no defining uses #146206
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
lcnr
force-pushed
the
fix-non-defining-uses
branch
from
9a8d6e8 to
8cab2b3
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
lcnr
force-pushed
the
fix-non-defining-uses
branch
from
8cab2b3 to
381b326
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r=BoxyUwU rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #139524 (Add socket extensions for cygwin) - #145940 (single buffer for exponent fmt of integers) - #146206 (identity uses are ok, even if there are no defining uses) - #146272 (Update comment for `-Werror` on LLVM builds) - #146280 (Make `LetChainsPolicy` public for rustfmt usage) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2025
Rollup merge of #146206 - lcnr:fix-non-defining-uses, r=BoxyUwU identity uses are ok, even if there are no defining uses fix #146191 I've tried moving the "is this an identity use" check to `fn clone_and_resolve_opaque_types` and this would allow the following code to compile as it now ignores `Opaque<'!a> = Opaque<'!a>` while they previously resulted in errors https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/71289c378d0a406a4f537fe4001282d19362931f/tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/hkl_forbidden.rs#L42-L46 The closure signature gets inferred to `for<'a> fn(&'a ()) -> Inner<'a>`. The closure then has a defining use `Inner<'a_latbound> = &'a_latebound ()` while the parent function has a non-defining `Inner<'!a> = Inner<'!a>`. By eagerly discarding identity uses we don't error on the non-defining use in the parent. r? `@BoxyUwU`
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#139524 (Add socket extensions for cygwin) - rust-lang/rust#145940 (single buffer for exponent fmt of integers) - rust-lang/rust#146206 (identity uses are ok, even if there are no defining uses) - rust-lang/rust#146272 (Update comment for `-Werror` on LLVM builds) - rust-lang/rust#146280 (Make `LetChainsPolicy` public for rustfmt usage) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix #146191
I've tried moving the "is this an identity use" check to
fn clone_and_resolve_opaque_typesand this would allow the following code to compile as it now ignoresOpaque<'!a> = Opaque<'!a>while they previously resulted in errorsrust/tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/hkl_forbidden.rs
Lines 42 to 46 in 71289c3
The closure signature gets inferred to
for<'a> fn(&'a ()) -> Inner<'a>. The closure then has a defining useInner<'a_latbound> = &'a_latebound ()while the parent function has a non-definingInner<'!a> = Inner<'!a>. By eagerly discarding identity uses we don't error on the non-defining use in the parent.r? @BoxyUwU