Stabilize new_zeroed_alloc
#144091
Merged
Stabilize new_zeroed_alloc
#144091
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
2 tasks
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
thaliaarchi
force-pushed
the
stabilize-new-zeroed
branch
2 times, most recently
from
36a935b to
a84ecd9
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@jieyouxu Are the bootstrap gates for |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
thaliaarchi
force-pushed
the
stabilize-new-zeroed
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f9df154 to
081ce42
Compare
Mark-Simulacrum
requested changes
Jul 19, 2025
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
Mark-Simulacrum
added
T-libs-api
thaliaarchi
force-pushed
the
stabilize-new-zeroed
branch
from
081ce42 to
0c18553
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
thaliaarchi
force-pushed
the
stabilize-new-zeroed
branch
from
0c18553 to
6d1c12a
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
thaliaarchi
force-pushed
the
stabilize-new-zeroed
branch
from
6d1c12a to
c82db9b
Compare
thaliaarchi
force-pushed
the
stabilize-new-zeroed
branch
from
c82db9b to
175afd7
Compare
Member
|
@rfcbot merge |
|
Team member @Amanieu has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
Member
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2025
…lacrum Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc` The corresponding `new_uninit` and `new_uninit_slice` functions were stabilized in #129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a [desire](#63291 (comment)) to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them. Tracking issue: #129396
Collaborator
tgross35
added a commit
to tgross35/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2025
…r=Mark-Simulacrum Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc` The corresponding `new_uninit` and `new_uninit_slice` functions were stabilized in rust-lang#129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a [desire](rust-lang#63291 (comment)) to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them. Tracking issue: rust-lang#129396
tgross35
added a commit
to tgross35/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2025
…r=Mark-Simulacrum Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc` The corresponding `new_uninit` and `new_uninit_slice` functions were stabilized in rust-lang#129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a [desire](rust-lang#63291 (comment)) to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them. Tracking issue: rust-lang#129396
Contributor
|
@bors retry rolled up |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #140983 (Improve doc of some methods that take ranges) - #144091 (Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc`) - #145664 (Stabilize `std::panic::Location::file_as_c_str`) - #146744 (Deref related cleanups in ref_prop) - #146793 (naked_asm: emit a label starting with `func_end`) - #146822 (Fix old typo in lang_start_internal comment) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2025
…lacrum Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc` The corresponding `new_uninit` and `new_uninit_slice` functions were stabilized in #129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a [desire](#63291 (comment)) to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them. Tracking issue: #129396
Collaborator
Contributor
|
@bors retry same thing |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #140983 (Improve doc of some methods that take ranges) - #144091 (Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc`) - #145664 (Stabilize `std::panic::Location::file_as_c_str`) - #146744 (Deref related cleanups in ref_prop) - #146793 (naked_asm: emit a label starting with `func_end`) - #146822 (Fix old typo in lang_start_internal comment) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2025
…lacrum Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc` The corresponding `new_uninit` and `new_uninit_slice` functions were stabilized in #129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a [desire](#63291 (comment)) to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them. Tracking issue: #129396
Member
|
Yielding to rollup again. Sorry for the noise; CI has been flaking out. @bors retry |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #140983 (Improve doc of some methods that take ranges) - #144091 (Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc`) - #145664 (Stabilize `std::panic::Location::file_as_c_str`) - #146551 (fix issue with `cmse-nonsecure-entry` ABI being both async and c-variadic) - #146744 (Deref related cleanups in ref_prop) - #146793 (naked_asm: emit a label starting with `func_end`) - #146820 (Add unstable attribute to BTreeMap-related allocator generics) - #146822 (Fix old typo in lang_start_internal comment) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Collaborator
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2025
Rollup merge of #144091 - thaliaarchi:stabilize-new-zeroed, r=Mark-Simulacrum Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc` The corresponding `new_uninit` and `new_uninit_slice` functions were stabilized in #129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a [desire](#63291 (comment)) to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them. Tracking issue: #129396
Muscraft
pushed a commit
to Muscraft/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
…r=Mark-Simulacrum Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc` The corresponding `new_uninit` and `new_uninit_slice` functions were stabilized in rust-lang#129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a [desire](rust-lang#63291 (comment)) to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them. Tracking issue: rust-lang#129396
Muscraft
pushed a commit
to Muscraft/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#140983 (Improve doc of some methods that take ranges) - rust-lang#144091 (Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc`) - rust-lang#145664 (Stabilize `std::panic::Location::file_as_c_str`) - rust-lang#146551 (fix issue with `cmse-nonsecure-entry` ABI being both async and c-variadic) - rust-lang#146744 (Deref related cleanups in ref_prop) - rust-lang#146793 (naked_asm: emit a label starting with `func_end`) - rust-lang#146820 (Add unstable attribute to BTreeMap-related allocator generics) - rust-lang#146822 (Fix old typo in lang_start_internal comment) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2025
…r=Mark-Simulacrum Stabilize `new_zeroed_alloc` The corresponding `new_uninit` and `new_uninit_slice` functions were stabilized in rust-lang#129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a [desire](rust-lang#63291 (comment)) to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them. Tracking issue: rust-lang#129396
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
10 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The corresponding
new_uninitandnew_uninit_slicefunctions were stabilized in #129401, but the zeroed counterparts were left for later out of a desire to stabilize only the minimal set. These functions are straightforward mirrors of the uninit functions and well-established. Since no blockers or design questions have surfaced in the past year, I think it's time to stabilize them.Tracking issue: #129396