- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
          compiler: Deduplicate must_emit_unwind_tables() comments
          #143564
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
            bors
  merged 2 commits into
  rust-lang:master
from
Enselic:must_emit_unwind_tables-comment
  
      
      
   
  Jul 7, 2025 
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
  
    compiler: Deduplicate must_emit_unwind_tables() comments
  
  #143564
              
                    bors
  merged 2 commits into
  rust-lang:master
from
Enselic:must_emit_unwind_tables-comment
  
      
      
   
  Jul 7, 2025 
              
            Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    Removing this reference was forgotten in eb4725f. Grepping for no_landing_pads returns no hits after this.
There is one comment at a call site and one comment in the function definition that are mostly saying the same thing. Fold the call site comment into the function definition comment to reduce duplication. There are actually some inaccuracies in the comments but let's deduplicate before we address the inaccuracies.
              
                    oli-obk
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    Jul 7, 2025 
                  
              
              
            
            
| @bors r+ rollup | 
    
  bors 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 7, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #143130 (doc(std): clarify `NonZero<T>` usage limitation in doc comment) - #143415 (Get rid of build-powerpc64le-toolchain.sh) - #143464 (Make tests/ui/abi/debug.rs cross-compile) - #143482 (Fix short linker error output) - #143524 (Move `stable_mir` back to its own crate) - #143528 (interpret: rename StackPopCleanup) - #143551 (Dont resolve instance of root in `mir_callgraph_cyclic`) - #143558 (mbe: Refactors and function extractions in `compile_declarative_macro`) - #143563 (std: fix typo in `std::path`) - #143564 (compiler: Deduplicate `must_emit_unwind_tables()` comments) - #143577 (Disable download-rustc for library profile) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  rust-timer 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 7, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup merge of #143564 - Enselic:must_emit_unwind_tables-comment, r=oli-obk compiler: Deduplicate `must_emit_unwind_tables()` comments There is one comment at a call site and one comment in the function definition that are mostly saying the same thing. Fold the call site comment into the function definition comment to reduce duplication. There are actually some inaccuracies in the comments but let's deduplicate before we address the inaccuracies.
    
  github-actions bot
      pushed a commit
        to devnexen/miri
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 8, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#143130 (doc(std): clarify `NonZero<T>` usage limitation in doc comment) - rust-lang/rust#143415 (Get rid of build-powerpc64le-toolchain.sh) - rust-lang/rust#143464 (Make tests/ui/abi/debug.rs cross-compile) - rust-lang/rust#143482 (Fix short linker error output) - rust-lang/rust#143524 (Move `stable_mir` back to its own crate) - rust-lang/rust#143528 (interpret: rename StackPopCleanup) - rust-lang/rust#143551 (Dont resolve instance of root in `mir_callgraph_cyclic`) - rust-lang/rust#143558 (mbe: Refactors and function extractions in `compile_declarative_macro`) - rust-lang/rust#143563 (std: fix typo in `std::path`) - rust-lang/rust#143564 (compiler: Deduplicate `must_emit_unwind_tables()` comments) - rust-lang/rust#143577 (Disable download-rustc for library profile) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    A-LLVM
  Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. 
  
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  
    T-compiler
  Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There is one comment at a call site and one comment in the function definition that are mostly saying the same thing. Fold the call site comment into the function definition comment to reduce duplication.
There are actually some inaccuracies in the comments but let's deduplicate before we address the inaccuracies.