-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Always inline InterpCx::layout_of after perf regression #143334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Stypox
wants to merge
1
commit into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
Stypox:layout_of-inline
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
That's not quite the right command -- and indeed you won't have permission. @bors2 try |
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2025
Always inline InterpCx::layout_of after perf regression Followup to #142721 to fix the performance regression. I ran one quick benchmark locally (`ctfe-stress-5`) and it does seem to be faster. I further tried adding `#[inline(always)]` to `compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/layout.rs` in `layout_of()` under `LayoutOfHelpers` but that didn't change the benchmark results at all. `@rust-timer` build e7e3c9e (I'm not sure I have permission to do the above) r? `@RalfJung` <!-- homu-ignore:start --> <!-- If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort, please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this. This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using r? <reviewer name> --> <!-- homu-ignore:end -->
Argh... |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
Queued 1ab17c0 with parent b94bd12, future comparison URL. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-perf
Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed.
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Followup to #142721 to fix the performance regression. I ran one quick benchmark locally (
ctfe-stress-5
) and it does seem to be faster. I further tried adding#[inline(always)]
tocompiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/layout.rs
inlayout_of()
underLayoutOfHelpers
but that didn't change the benchmark results at all.@rust-timer build e7e3c9e
(I'm not sure I have permission to do the above)
r? @RalfJung