Skip to content

Port #[rustc_object_lifetime_default] to the new attribute parsing … #143240

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Contributor

Ports rustc_object_lifetime_default to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for #131229 (comment)

r? @oli-obk
cc @jdonszelmann

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 30, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 30, 2025

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_data_structures

cc @jdonszelmann

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs

cc @jdonszelmann

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

@JonathanBrouwer JonathanBrouwer force-pushed the object_lifetime_default_parser branch from 545613b to 9f3342b Compare June 30, 2025 14:23
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 1, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #142921) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@JonathanBrouwer JonathanBrouwer force-pushed the object_lifetime_default_parser branch from 9f3342b to 1e474c2 Compare July 1, 2025 14:31
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Contributor Author

^ Rebased

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 1, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 1, 2025

📌 Commit 1e474c2 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 1, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #136801 (Implement `Random` for tuple)
 - #141867 (Describe Future invariants more precisely)
 - #142760 (docs(fs): Touch up grammar on lock api)
 - #143181 (Improve testing and error messages for malformed attributes)
 - #143210 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [19/N] )
 - #143212 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [20/N])
 - #143230 ([COMPILETEST-UNTANGLE 2/N] Make some compiletest errors/warnings/help more visually obvious)
 - #143240 (Port `#[rustc_object_lifetime_default]` to the new attribute parsing …)
 - #143255 (Do not enable LLD by default in the dist profile)
 - #143262 (mir: Mark `Statement` and `BasicBlockData` as `#[non_exhaustive]`)
 - #143269 (bootstrap: make comment more clear)
 - #143279 (Remove `ItemKind::descr` method)

Failed merges:

 - #143237 (Port `#[no_implicit_prelude]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 61bb076 into rust-lang:master Jul 1, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Jul 1, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
Rollup merge of #143240 - JonathanBrouwer:object_lifetime_default_parser, r=oli-obk

Port `#[rustc_object_lifetime_default]` to the new attribute parsing …

Ports rustc_object_lifetime_default to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for #131229 (comment)

r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@jdonszelmann`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants