Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot #141967
Merged
+35
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jieyouxu
added
the
T-bootstrap
rustbot
added
the
A-meta
jieyouxu
force-pushed
the
bootstrap-backports
branch
from
0ff82ed to
6f48758
Compare
jieyouxu
changed the title
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
|
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
…bzol Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot Following the discussion in [#t-infra/bootstrap > ✔ Have triagebot create backport nomination threads?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/with/521876500) where we noticed that bootstrap backport nominations were difficult to track, since: - We don't really have a dedicated person / group of people checking for bootstrap backport nominations. - We don't really have an establish way of handling bootstrap backports. This PR configures triagebot to open backport nominations threads (indicated for bootstrap team if a given PR has the suitable team label, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/T-bootstrap) in [#t-infra/bootstrap/backports](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/507486-t-infra.2Fbootstrap.2Fbackports). The current configuration is such that **the whole bootstrap team will be pinged for bootstrap backport nominations**[^diverges]. ### Steps - [x] ~~Ping members who opt-in subscribe to backport channel, or ping the whole bootstrap team?~~ - Poll: [#t-infra/bootstrap > Have triagebot create backport nomination threads? @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/near/522141337) - Votes (as of 2025-06-10): 3 votes "no preference", 1 vote "in favor". - [x] ~~(Best for follow-up) Maybe also document bootstrap team's backport process / decision process in Forge? It's a bit different from [compiler team's backport process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/backports.html) because we don't have weekly bootstrap triage meetings and thus don't have sync backport decisions.~~ - Tracked as follow-up in Forge: rust-lang/rust-forge#889. --- r? Kobzol [^diverges]: Note that this configuration is similar to the types team backport nominations, but diverges from the compiler team.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #128425 (Make `missing_fragment_specifier` an unconditional error) - #141639 (Expose discriminant values in stable_mir) - #141967 (Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot) - #142042 (Make E0621 missing lifetime suggestion verbose) - #142176 (tests: Split dont-shuffle-bswaps along opt-levels and arches) - #142235 (Build rustc with assertions in `dist-alt` jobs) - #142248 (Add supported asm types for LoongArch32) - #142272 (tests: Change ABIs in tests to more future-resilient ones) - #142282 (Only run `citool` tests on the `auto` branch) - #142285 (tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats) - #142297 (Implement `//@ needs-target-std` compiletest directive) - #142298 (Make loongarch-none target maintainers more easily pingable) - #142306 (Dont unwrap and re-wrap typing envs) Failed merges: - #141942 (Implement representation options to smir) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
…bzol Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot Following the discussion in [#t-infra/bootstrap > ✔ Have triagebot create backport nomination threads?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/with/521876500) where we noticed that bootstrap backport nominations were difficult to track, since: - We don't really have a dedicated person / group of people checking for bootstrap backport nominations. - We don't really have an establish way of handling bootstrap backports. This PR configures triagebot to open backport nominations threads (indicated for bootstrap team if a given PR has the suitable team label, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/T-bootstrap) in [#t-infra/bootstrap/backports](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/507486-t-infra.2Fbootstrap.2Fbackports). The current configuration is such that **the whole bootstrap team will be pinged for bootstrap backport nominations**[^diverges]. ### Steps - [x] ~~Ping members who opt-in subscribe to backport channel, or ping the whole bootstrap team?~~ - Poll: [#t-infra/bootstrap > Have triagebot create backport nomination threads? @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/near/522141337) - Votes (as of 2025-06-10): 3 votes "no preference", 1 vote "in favor". - [x] ~~(Best for follow-up) Maybe also document bootstrap team's backport process / decision process in Forge? It's a bit different from [compiler team's backport process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/backports.html) because we don't have weekly bootstrap triage meetings and thus don't have sync backport decisions.~~ - Tracked as follow-up in Forge: rust-lang/rust-forge#889. --- r? Kobzol [^diverges]: Note that this configuration is similar to the types team backport nominations, but diverges from the compiler team.
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
…bzol Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot Following the discussion in [#t-infra/bootstrap > ✔ Have triagebot create backport nomination threads?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/with/521876500) where we noticed that bootstrap backport nominations were difficult to track, since: - We don't really have a dedicated person / group of people checking for bootstrap backport nominations. - We don't really have an establish way of handling bootstrap backports. This PR configures triagebot to open backport nominations threads (indicated for bootstrap team if a given PR has the suitable team label, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/T-bootstrap) in [#t-infra/bootstrap/backports](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/507486-t-infra.2Fbootstrap.2Fbackports). The current configuration is such that **the whole bootstrap team will be pinged for bootstrap backport nominations**[^diverges]. ### Steps - [x] ~~Ping members who opt-in subscribe to backport channel, or ping the whole bootstrap team?~~ - Poll: [#t-infra/bootstrap > Have triagebot create backport nomination threads? @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/near/522141337) - Votes (as of 2025-06-10): 3 votes "no preference", 1 vote "in favor". - [x] ~~(Best for follow-up) Maybe also document bootstrap team's backport process / decision process in Forge? It's a bit different from [compiler team's backport process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/backports.html) because we don't have weekly bootstrap triage meetings and thus don't have sync backport decisions.~~ - Tracked as follow-up in Forge: rust-lang/rust-forge#889. --- r? Kobzol [^diverges]: Note that this configuration is similar to the types team backport nominations, but diverges from the compiler team.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #134841 (Look at proc-macro attributes when encountering unknown attribute) - #141639 (Expose discriminant values in stable_mir) - #141967 (Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot) - #142042 (Make E0621 missing lifetime suggestion verbose) - #142176 (tests: Split dont-shuffle-bswaps along opt-levels and arches) - #142248 (Add supported asm types for LoongArch32) - #142272 (tests: Change ABIs in tests to more future-resilient ones) - #142282 (Only run `citool` tests on the `auto` branch) - #142297 (Implement `//@ needs-target-std` compiletest directive) - #142298 (Make loongarch-none target maintainers more easily pingable) - #142306 (Dont unwrap and re-wrap typing envs) - #142324 (Remove unneeded `FunctionCx` from some codegen methods) - #142328 (feat: Add `bit_width` for unsigned integer types) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
…bzol Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot Following the discussion in [#t-infra/bootstrap > ✔ Have triagebot create backport nomination threads?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/with/521876500) where we noticed that bootstrap backport nominations were difficult to track, since: - We don't really have a dedicated person / group of people checking for bootstrap backport nominations. - We don't really have an establish way of handling bootstrap backports. This PR configures triagebot to open backport nominations threads (indicated for bootstrap team if a given PR has the suitable team label, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/T-bootstrap) in [#t-infra/bootstrap/backports](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/507486-t-infra.2Fbootstrap.2Fbackports). The current configuration is such that **the whole bootstrap team will be pinged for bootstrap backport nominations**[^diverges]. ### Steps - [x] ~~Ping members who opt-in subscribe to backport channel, or ping the whole bootstrap team?~~ - Poll: [#t-infra/bootstrap > Have triagebot create backport nomination threads? @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/near/522141337) - Votes (as of 2025-06-10): 3 votes "no preference", 1 vote "in favor". - [x] ~~(Best for follow-up) Maybe also document bootstrap team's backport process / decision process in Forge? It's a bit different from [compiler team's backport process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/backports.html) because we don't have weekly bootstrap triage meetings and thus don't have sync backport decisions.~~ - Tracked as follow-up in Forge: rust-lang/rust-forge#889. --- r? Kobzol [^diverges]: Note that this configuration is similar to the types team backport nominations, but diverges from the compiler team.
This was referenced Jun 11, 2025
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #141967 (Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot) - #142042 (Make E0621 missing lifetime suggestion verbose) - #142272 (tests: Change ABIs in tests to more future-resilient ones) - #142282 (Only run `citool` tests on the `auto` branch) - #142297 (Implement `//@ needs-target-std` compiletest directive) - #142298 (Make loongarch-none target maintainers more easily pingable) - #142306 (Dont unwrap and re-wrap typing envs) - #142324 (Remove unneeded `FunctionCx` from some codegen methods) - #142328 (feat: Add `bit_width` for unsigned integer types) Failed merges: - #141639 (Expose discriminant values in stable_mir) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
Rollup merge of #141967 - jieyouxu:bootstrap-backports, r=Kobzol Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot Following the discussion in [#t-infra/bootstrap > ✔ Have triagebot create backport nomination threads?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/with/521876500) where we noticed that bootstrap backport nominations were difficult to track, since: - We don't really have a dedicated person / group of people checking for bootstrap backport nominations. - We don't really have an establish way of handling bootstrap backports. This PR configures triagebot to open backport nominations threads (indicated for bootstrap team if a given PR has the suitable team label, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/T-bootstrap) in [#t-infra/bootstrap/backports](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/507486-t-infra.2Fbootstrap.2Fbackports). The current configuration is such that **the whole bootstrap team will be pinged for bootstrap backport nominations**[^diverges]. ### Steps - [x] ~~Ping members who opt-in subscribe to backport channel, or ping the whole bootstrap team?~~ - Poll: [#t-infra/bootstrap > Have triagebot create backport nomination threads? @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Have.20triagebot.20create.20backport.20nomination.20threads.3F/near/522141337) - Votes (as of 2025-06-10): 3 votes "no preference", 1 vote "in favor". - [x] ~~(Best for follow-up) Maybe also document bootstrap team's backport process / decision process in Forge? It's a bit different from [compiler team's backport process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/backports.html) because we don't have weekly bootstrap triage meetings and thus don't have sync backport decisions.~~ - Tracked as follow-up in Forge: rust-lang/rust-forge#889. --- r? Kobzol [^diverges]: Note that this configuration is similar to the types team backport nominations, but diverges from the compiler team.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#141967 (Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot) - rust-lang/rust#142042 (Make E0621 missing lifetime suggestion verbose) - rust-lang/rust#142272 (tests: Change ABIs in tests to more future-resilient ones) - rust-lang/rust#142282 (Only run `citool` tests on the `auto` branch) - rust-lang/rust#142297 (Implement `//@ needs-target-std` compiletest directive) - rust-lang/rust#142298 (Make loongarch-none target maintainers more easily pingable) - rust-lang/rust#142306 (Dont unwrap and re-wrap typing envs) - rust-lang/rust#142324 (Remove unneeded `FunctionCx` from some codegen methods) - rust-lang/rust#142328 (feat: Add `bit_width` for unsigned integer types) Failed merges: - rust-lang/rust#141639 (Expose discriminant values in stable_mir) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following the discussion in #t-infra/bootstrap > ✔ Have triagebot create backport nomination threads? where we noticed that bootstrap backport nominations were difficult to track, since:
This PR configures triagebot to open backport nominations threads (indicated for bootstrap team if a given PR has the suitable team label, T-bootstrapRelevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
) in #t-infra/bootstrap/backports. The current configuration is such that the whole bootstrap team will be pinged for bootstrap backport nominations1.
Steps
Ping members who opt-in subscribe to backport channel, or ping the whole bootstrap team?(Best for follow-up) Maybe also document bootstrap team's backport process / decision process in Forge? It's a bit different from compiler team's backport process because we don't have weekly bootstrap triage meetings and thus don't have sync backport decisions.r? Kobzol
Footnotes
Note that this configuration is similar to the types team backport nominations, but diverges from the compiler team. ↩