Skip to content

refactor CanonicalVarKind #141432

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2025
Merged

refactor CanonicalVarKind #141432

merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2025

Conversation

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented May 23, 2025

it's unnecessary. I don't believe we'll ever need to store additional info shared by all CanonicalVarKinds.

r? @compiler-errors

@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-search Area: Rustdoc's search feature S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels May 23, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 23, 2025

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the canonicalize-regions branch 5 times, most recently from 8d9fdaa to d973da0 Compare May 23, 2025 10:24
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the canonicalize-regions branch 2 times, most recently from 34ebb7b to c4d0649 Compare May 23, 2025 11:05
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the canonicalize-regions branch from c4d0649 to 2746b9b Compare May 23, 2025 11:41
@lcnr lcnr changed the title yeet CanonicalVarInfo refactor CanonicalVarKind May 23, 2025
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented May 23, 2025

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 23, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
@bors
Auto merge of #141432 - lcnr:canonicalize-regions, r=<try>
16adb60 
refactor `CanonicalVarKind`

it's unnecessary. I don't believe we'll ever need to store additional info shared by all `CanonicalVarKind`s.

r? `@compiler-errors`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 05d9393 with merge 16adb60...

@rust-cloud-vms rust-cloud-vms bot force-pushed the canonicalize-regions branch 2 times, most recently from 4152df6 to 326b7e9 Compare May 23, 2025 12:26
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented May 23, 2025

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
@bors
Auto merge of #141432 - lcnr:canonicalize-regions, r=<try>
3b75cbf 
refactor `CanonicalVarKind`

it's unnecessary. I don't believe we'll ever need to store additional info shared by all `CanonicalVarKind`s.

r? `@compiler-errors`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 326b7e9 with merge 3b75cbf...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 3b75cbf (3b75cbf33c8acc2099df445913515260c9143b25)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3b75cbf): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.8%, secondary -2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)		 - - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)		 - - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)		 -1.8% [-1.8%, -1.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)		 -2.6% [-2.6%, -2.6%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.8% [-1.8%, -1.8%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 776.992s -> 776.009s (-0.13%)
Artifact size: 365.49 MiB -> 365.48 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 23, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 24, 2025

📌 Commit 326b7e9 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 24, 2025
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request May 24, 2025
Merged
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2025
@bors
Auto merge of #141506 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-80f1geg, r=matthiaskrgr
038d599 
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #137323 (Guarantee behavior of transmuting `Option::<T>::None` subject to NPO)
 - #139254 (std: sys: net: uefi: Implement TCP4 connect)
 - #141432 (refactor `CanonicalVarKind`)
 - #141480 (document some -Z flags as living in the rustc-dev-guide)
 - #141486 (rustdoc book: add argument explanation for `html_playground_url`)
 - #141496 (Enable `[issue-links]` and `[no-mentions]` in triagebot)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4b8dcb5 into rust-lang:master May 24, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 24, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2025
@rust-timer
Unrolled build for #141432
8f663ed 
Rollup merge of #141432 - lcnr:canonicalize-regions, r=compiler-errors

refactor `CanonicalVarKind`

it's unnecessary. I don't believe we'll ever need to store additional info shared by all `CanonicalVarKind`s.

r? `@compiler-errors`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@compiler-errors compiler-errors

Labels

A-rustdoc-search Area: Rustdoc's search feature S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.89.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@lcnr @rustbot @rust-log-analyzer @rust-timer @bors @compiler-errors