[do not merge] Test PR for moving off rust-lang-ci

[Kobzol]

This PR will serve for testing the move from rust-lang-ci to rust-lang, and also for closing and opening the tree before/after the move.

[Kobzol]

Closing the tree in order to move CI from rust-lang-ci to rust-lang (rust-lang/homu#233).

[Kobzol]

@bors try

Trying a try build on rust-lang/rust with homu.

[Kobzol]

@bors ping

[bors]

😪 I'm awake I'm awake

[Kobzol]

@bors try

[Kobzol]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit b1c3296 with merge e5cc42d...

[Kobzol]

@rust-timer queue

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: e5cc42d (e5cc42d3eeeff112203ddd4d1dfaeca784a0fb0e)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (e5cc42d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 7.8%, secondary -4.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	7.8%	[7.8%, 7.8%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.6%	[-6.8%, -2.4%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	7.8%	[7.8%, 7.8%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 777.568s -> 777.728s (0.02%)
Artifact size: 365.56 MiB -> 365.55 MiB (-0.00%)

[Kobzol]

It looks like all of perf., try builds and auto builds (including merges) work on rust-lang/rust. I think that we can reopen the tree 🎉