Skip to content

Support using const pointers in asm const operand #138618

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nbdd0121
Copy link
Contributor

@nbdd0121 nbdd0121 commented Mar 17, 2025

Implements #128464

This adds support of const pointers for asm const in addition to plain integers.

The inline asm! support is implemented using i constraint, and the global_asm! and naked_asm! support is implemented by inserting symbol + offset and make symbol compiler-used. For unnamed consts, it will create additional internal & hidden symbols so that they can be referenced by global_asm.

The feature is also implemented for GCC backend but it's untested.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 17, 2025

r? @fmease

rustbot has assigned @fmease.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 17, 2025
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Mar 17, 2025

r? codegen

@rustbot rustbot assigned workingjubilee and unassigned fmease Mar 17, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? compiler-errors

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 10, 2025

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa

cc @WaffleLapkin

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez

@@ -25,9 +26,12 @@ pub enum InlineAsmOperandRef<'tcx, B: BackendTypes + ?Sized> {
in_value: OperandRef<'tcx, B::Value>,
out_place: Option<PlaceRef<'tcx, B::Value>>,
},
Const {
Interpolate {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add more doc comment explaining the significance of the difference between Interpolate and Const for backends. It begs the question for why we ever turn const operands into strings, for example.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some explaination. Technically we should be able to use Const for integers, although I am a bit conservative here and don't want to change how existing things work.

This might also be useful to have in the future if we decided to add interpolate "some CTFE string to be interpolated" new type of operand.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 29, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #140415) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@traviscross
Copy link
Contributor

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 4, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 4, 2025

Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 13, 2025

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift

cc @bjorn3

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 28, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #141668) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

// and on x86 PIC symbol can't be constant.
// x86_64-LABEL: const_ptr:
// x86_64: #APP
// x86_64: mov al, byte ptr [{{.*}}anon{{.*}}]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

// x86_64: mov al, byte ptr [{{.*}}anon{{.*}}]

What was the expansion you observed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mov al, byte ptr [.Lanon.2e8c0013b01edcd3779e8174c2338a00.0]

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 10, 2025

📌 Commit 81a4b3e has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 10, 2025
tgross35 added a commit to tgross35/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2025
…-errors

Support using const pointers in asm `const` operand

Implements rust-lang#128464

This adds support of const pointers for asm `const` in addition to plain integers.

The inline `asm!` support is implemented using `i` constraint, and the `global_asm!` and `naked_asm!` support is implemented by inserting `symbol + offset` and make `symbol` compiler-used. For unnamed consts, it will create additional internal & hidden symbols so that they can be referenced by global_asm.

The feature is also implemented for GCC backend but it's untested.
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r-

486ffda changed the signature for const_alloc_to_llvm, see the failure at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/16206384671/job/45757598329?pr=143753

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 10, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 10, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #143746) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

nbdd0121 added 6 commits July 11, 2025 14:04
This is used for string interpolation currently, so rename it as so.
The name `Const` will be used to denote a general CTFE constant that
can either be integer or pointer.
This is intended for supporting passing arbitrary CTFE const into inline
assembly.
`global_asm!` themselves don't need symbol names; they currently only have
a symbol name during mono collecion to identify them to partitioning
algorithm.

However it will have shims generated under it which will need unique symbol
names. The name themselves ultimately doesn't matter, so they're generated
like other shim instances.
This is currently a no-op, but will be useful when const in `global_asm!`
can be pointers.
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 11, 2025

📌 Commit 8da54fc has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jul 11, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup-

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 11, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 8da54fc with merge 8e7515b...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2025
Support using const pointers in asm `const` operand

Implements #128464

This adds support of const pointers for asm `const` in addition to plain integers.

The inline `asm!` support is implemented using `i` constraint, and the `global_asm!` and `naked_asm!` support is implemented by inserting `symbol + offset` and make `symbol` compiler-used. For unnamed consts, it will create additional internal & hidden symbols so that they can be referenced by global_asm.

The feature is also implemented for GCC backend but it's untested.
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
---- [ui] tests/ui/asm/const-refs-to-static.rs stdout ----

error: test compilation failed although it shouldn't!
status: exit status: 1
command: env -u RUSTC_LOG_COLOR RUSTC_ICE="0" RUST_BACKTRACE="short" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc" "/checkout/tests/ui/asm/const-refs-to-static.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "-Zsimulate-remapped-rust-src-base=/rustc/FAKE_PREFIX" "-Ztranslate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/cargo" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/checkout/vendor" "--sysroot" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2" "--target=i586-unknown-linux-gnu" "--check-cfg" "cfg(test,FALSE)" "--error-format" "json" "--json" "future-incompat" "-Ccodegen-units=1" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zwrite-long-types-to-disk=no" "-Cstrip=debuginfo" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "--out-dir" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/asm/const-refs-to-static" "-A" "unused" "-A" "internal_features" "-A" "unused_parens" "-A" "unused_braces" "-Crpath" "-Cdebuginfo=0" "-Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/i586-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers" "-Clinker=i586-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc"
stdout: none
--- stderr -------------------------------
error: invalid operand for inline asm constraint 'i'
##[error]  --> /checkout/tests/ui/asm/const-refs-to-static.rs:17:20
   |
LL |     unsafe { asm!("/* {} */", const addr_of!(FOO)) };
   |                    ^^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to 1 previous error
------------------------------------------

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 11, 2025

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jul 11, 2025
@nbdd0121
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like the i constraint doesn't work for GOT-rebased relocation, which x86 use for PIE and we enable PIE by default. We need to either:

  • Say this works only with static relocation-model on x86, or
  • Generate symbol + offset ourselves, like global_asm implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.