remove simd_fpow and simd_fpowi
#137595
Merged
remove simd_fpow and simd_fpowi
#137595
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift cc @bjorn3 Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc |
This was referenced Feb 25, 2025
|
LGTM, thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137370 (adjust_abi: make fallback logic for ABIs a bit easier to read) - rust-lang#137444 (Improve behavior of `IF_LET_RESCOPE` around temporaries and place expressions) - rust-lang#137464 (Fix invalid suggestion from type error for derive macro) - rust-lang#137539 ( Add rustdoc-gui regression test for rust-lang#137082 ) - rust-lang#137576 (Don't doc-comment BTreeMap<K, SetValZST, A>) - rust-lang#137595 (remove `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi`) - rust-lang#137600 (type_ir: remove redundant part of comment) - rust-lang#137602 (feature: fix typo in attribute description) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137595 - folkertdev:remove-simd-pow-powi, r=RalfJung remove `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` Discussed in rust-lang#137555 These functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics::simd`, and not used anywhere outside of the compiler. They also don't lower to particularly good code at least on the major ISAs (I checked x86_64, aarch64, s390x, powerpc), where the vector is just spilled to the stack and scalar functions are used for the actual logic. r? `@RalfJung`
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2025
… r=RalfJung import `simd_` intrinsics In most cases, we can import the simd intrinsics rather than redeclare them. Apparently, most of these tests were written before `std::intrinsics::simd` existed. There are a couple of exceptions where we can't yet import: - the intrinsics are not declared as `const fn` in the standard library, causing issues in the `const-eval` tests - the `simd_shuffle_generic` function is not exposed from `std::intrinsics` - the `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics` (removed in rust-lang#137595) - some tests use `no_core`, and therefore cannot use `std::intrinsics` r? `@RalfJung` cc `@workingjubilee` do you have context on why some intrinsics are not exposed?
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2025
… r=RalfJung import `simd_` intrinsics In most cases, we can import the simd intrinsics rather than redeclare them. Apparently, most of these tests were written before `std::intrinsics::simd` existed. There are a couple of exceptions where we can't yet import: - the intrinsics are not declared as `const fn` in the standard library, causing issues in the `const-eval` tests - the `simd_shuffle_generic` function is not exposed from `std::intrinsics` - the `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics` (removed in rust-lang#137595) - some tests use `no_core`, and therefore cannot use `std::intrinsics` r? ``@RalfJung`` cc ``@workingjubilee`` do you have context on why some intrinsics are not exposed?
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2025
… r=RalfJung import `simd_` intrinsics In most cases, we can import the simd intrinsics rather than redeclare them. Apparently, most of these tests were written before `std::intrinsics::simd` existed. There are a couple of exceptions where we can't yet import: - the intrinsics are not declared as `const fn` in the standard library, causing issues in the `const-eval` tests - the `simd_shuffle_generic` function is not exposed from `std::intrinsics` - the `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics` (removed in rust-lang#137595) - some tests use `no_core`, and therefore cannot use `std::intrinsics` r? ```@RalfJung``` cc ```@workingjubilee``` do you have context on why some intrinsics are not exposed?
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137551 - folkertdev:import-simd-intrinsics, r=RalfJung import `simd_` intrinsics In most cases, we can import the simd intrinsics rather than redeclare them. Apparently, most of these tests were written before `std::intrinsics::simd` existed. There are a couple of exceptions where we can't yet import: - the intrinsics are not declared as `const fn` in the standard library, causing issues in the `const-eval` tests - the `simd_shuffle_generic` function is not exposed from `std::intrinsics` - the `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics` (removed in rust-lang#137595) - some tests use `no_core`, and therefore cannot use `std::intrinsics` r? ```@RalfJung``` cc ```@workingjubilee``` do you have context on why some intrinsics are not exposed?
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137370 (adjust_abi: make fallback logic for ABIs a bit easier to read) - rust-lang#137444 (Improve behavior of `IF_LET_RESCOPE` around temporaries and place expressions) - rust-lang#137464 (Fix invalid suggestion from type error for derive macro) - rust-lang#137539 ( Add rustdoc-gui regression test for rust-lang#137082 ) - rust-lang#137576 (Don't doc-comment BTreeMap<K, SetValZST, A>) - rust-lang#137595 (remove `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi`) - rust-lang#137600 (type_ir: remove redundant part of comment) - rust-lang#137602 (feature: fix typo in attribute description) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
… r=RalfJung import `simd_` intrinsics In most cases, we can import the simd intrinsics rather than redeclare them. Apparently, most of these tests were written before `std::intrinsics::simd` existed. There are a couple of exceptions where we can't yet import: - the intrinsics are not declared as `const fn` in the standard library, causing issues in the `const-eval` tests - the `simd_shuffle_generic` function is not exposed from `std::intrinsics` - the `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics` (removed in rust-lang#137595) - some tests use `no_core`, and therefore cannot use `std::intrinsics` r? ```@RalfJung``` cc ```@workingjubilee``` do you have context on why some intrinsics are not exposed?
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137370 (adjust_abi: make fallback logic for ABIs a bit easier to read) - rust-lang#137444 (Improve behavior of `IF_LET_RESCOPE` around temporaries and place expressions) - rust-lang#137464 (Fix invalid suggestion from type error for derive macro) - rust-lang#137539 ( Add rustdoc-gui regression test for rust-lang#137082 ) - rust-lang#137576 (Don't doc-comment BTreeMap<K, SetValZST, A>) - rust-lang#137595 (remove `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi`) - rust-lang#137600 (type_ir: remove redundant part of comment) - rust-lang#137602 (feature: fix typo in attribute description) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
… r=RalfJung import `simd_` intrinsics In most cases, we can import the simd intrinsics rather than redeclare them. Apparently, most of these tests were written before `std::intrinsics::simd` existed. There are a couple of exceptions where we can't yet import: - the intrinsics are not declared as `const fn` in the standard library, causing issues in the `const-eval` tests - the `simd_shuffle_generic` function is not exposed from `std::intrinsics` - the `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics` (removed in rust-lang#137595) - some tests use `no_core`, and therefore cannot use `std::intrinsics` r? ```@RalfJung``` cc ```@workingjubilee``` do you have context on why some intrinsics are not exposed?
bjorn3
pushed a commit
to bjorn3/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
…=RalfJung remove `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` Discussed in rust-lang#137555 These functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics::simd`, and not used anywhere outside of the compiler. They also don't lower to particularly good code at least on the major ISAs (I checked x86_64, aarch64, s390x, powerpc), where the vector is just spilled to the stack and scalar functions are used for the actual logic. r? `@RalfJung`
bjorn3
pushed a commit
to bjorn3/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#137370 (adjust_abi: make fallback logic for ABIs a bit easier to read) - rust-lang#137444 (Improve behavior of `IF_LET_RESCOPE` around temporaries and place expressions) - rust-lang#137464 (Fix invalid suggestion from type error for derive macro) - rust-lang#137539 ( Add rustdoc-gui regression test for rust-lang#137082 ) - rust-lang#137576 (Don't doc-comment BTreeMap<K, SetValZST, A>) - rust-lang#137595 (remove `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi`) - rust-lang#137600 (type_ir: remove redundant part of comment) - rust-lang#137602 (feature: fix typo in attribute description) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
GuillaumeGomez
pushed a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2025
…=RalfJung remove `simd_fpow` and `simd_fpowi` Discussed in rust-lang#137555 These functions are not exposed from `std::intrinsics::simd`, and not used anywhere outside of the compiler. They also don't lower to particularly good code at least on the major ISAs (I checked x86_64, aarch64, s390x, powerpc), where the vector is just spilled to the stack and scalar functions are used for the actual logic. r? `@RalfJung`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Discussed in #137555
These functions are not exposed from
std::intrinsics::simd, and not used anywhere outside of the compiler. They also don't lower to particularly good code at least on the major ISAs (I checked x86_64, aarch64, s390x, powerpc), where the vector is just spilled to the stack and scalar functions are used for the actual logic.r? @RalfJung