Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #132762

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #132762

merged 14 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

@Zalathar Zalathar commented Nov 8, 2024

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Zalathar and others added 14 commits October 31, 2024 16:49
We only need to take action when the next block cannot be added to the current
chain, but the logic is much simpler if we express it in terms of when the
block _can_ be added.
The channel's `Block::new` was causing a stack overflow because it held
32 item slots, instantiated on the stack before moving to `Box::new`.
The 32x multiplier made modestly-large item sizes untenable.

That block is now initialized directly on the heap.

Fixes rust-lang#102246
Improve identation, and a few other rvalue printing
…er-errors

[StableMIR] A few fixes to pretty printing

Improve identation, and a few other rvalue printing

try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: test-various
coverage: Simplify parts of coverage graph creation

This is a combination of three semi-related simplifications to how coverage graphs are created, grouped into one PR to avoid conflicts.

There are no observable changes to the output of any of the coverage tests.
…ouxu

coverage: Extract safe FFI wrapper functions to `llvm_cov`

This PR takes all of the inline `unsafe` calls in coverage codegen, and all the safe wrapper functions in `coverageinfo/mod.rs`, and moves them to a new `llvm_cov` submodule that is dedicated to safe FFI wrapper functions. This reduces the mixing of abstraction levels in the rest of coverage codegen.

As a follow-up, this PR also tidies up the names and signatures of several of the coverage FFI functions.
Simplify FFI calls for `-Ztime-llvm-passes` and `-Zprint-codegen-stats`

The existing code for these unstable LLVM-infodump flags was jumping through hoops to pass an allocated C string across the FFI boundary, when it's much simpler to just write to a `&RustString` instead.
…eemdev

Initialize channel `Block`s directly on the heap

The channel's `Block::new` was causing a stack overflow because it held
32 item slots, instantiated on the stack before moving to `Box::new`.
The 32x multiplier made modestly-large item sizes untenable.

That block is now initialized directly on the heap.

Fixes rust-lang#102246

try-job: test-various
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Nov 8, 2024
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zalathar commented Nov 8, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 8, 2024

📌 Commit 4b904ce has been approved by Zalathar

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 8, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 8, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 4b904ce with merge 6295686...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 8, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Zalathar
Pushing 6295686 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 8, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 6295686 into rust-lang:master Nov 8, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Nov 8, 2024
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the rollup-qfgz165 branch November 8, 2024 10:27
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#132161 [StableMIR] A few fixes to pretty printing 983e4ff29e282d0eabccf60c0ffd6eca014ee8c4 (link)
#132389 coverage: Simplify parts of coverage graph creation 11da1b271d4aadcccf538a285b039af3f4e383b4 (link)
#132452 coverage: Extract safe FFI wrapper functions to llvm_cov 1c393d0a23d53860b4fad77a2b8e6af67ea3ad80 (link)
#132590 Simplify FFI calls for -Ztime-llvm-passes and `-Zprint-co… e03b06a358147aff1bd4eefe08754e6a71ab8bf9 (link)
#132738 Initialize channel Blocks directly on the heap 21ee11f26782a539e518e7f16e04f5626e37725c (link)

previous master: 78bb5ee79e

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (6295686): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.4%, 0.5%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.4% [0.4%, 0.5%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.6% [1.3%, 4.0%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.2% [-1.2%, -1.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.4% [-1.2%, 4.0%] 3

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.1% [0.0%, 0.7%] 12
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [-0.2%, 0.7%] 13

Bootstrap: 780.076s -> 781.673s (0.20%)
Artifact size: 335.37 MiB -> 335.35 MiB (-0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants