Do not call source_span when not tracking dependencies.

[cjgillot]

Split from #127241

[rustbot]

r? @compiler-errors

rustbot has assigned @compiler-errors.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[petrochenkov]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit bb17fda with merge c09d9f8...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: c09d9f8 (c09d9f8ba914677996613f7a2d3c9284db39737b)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (c09d9f8): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	24
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	24

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-1.0%, -1.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-1.0%, -1.0%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 750.904s -> 750.776s (-0.02%)
Artifact size: 338.92 MiB -> 338.88 MiB (-0.01%)

[petrochenkov]

r? @petrochenkov
@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit bb17fda has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit bb17fda with merge 42fadbd...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job x86_64-msvc-ext failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[RUSTC-TIMING] miri test:false 4.547
error: failed to remove file `C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage1-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\release\miri.exe`

Caused by:
  Access is denied. (os error 5)
Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.
  local time: Mon, Aug 26, 2024 12:55:27 PM
  network time: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:55:27 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[petrochenkov]

@bors retry

[cjgillot]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit bb17fda with merge a922197...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job x86_64-msvc-ext failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[RUSTC-TIMING] miri test:false 4.505
error: failed to remove file `C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage1-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\release\miri.exe`

Caused by:
  Access is denied. (os error 5)
Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.
  local time: Tue, Aug 27, 2024  4:52:55 AM
  network time: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 04:52:56 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[tgross35]

@bors retry #127883

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit bb17fda with merge 64b0ee6...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job i686-gnu-nopt failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[cjgillot]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit bb17fda with merge ab869e0...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing ab869e0 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (ab869e0): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	20
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	20

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.1%	[2.1%, 2.1%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.1%	[2.1%, 2.1%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary -2.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 749.925s -> 750.285s (0.05%)
Artifact size: 338.74 MiB -> 338.87 MiB (0.04%)