-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls #128923
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Aug 10, 2024
Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs cc @camelid |
fmease
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2024
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 10, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128273 (Improve `Ord` violation help) - rust-lang#128807 (run-make: explaing why fmt-write-bloat is ignore-windows) - rust-lang#128903 (rustdoc-json-types `Discriminant`: fix typo) - rust-lang#128905 (gitignore: Add Zed and Helix editors) - rust-lang#128908 (diagnostics: do not warn when a lifetime bound infers itself) - rust-lang#128909 (Fix dump-ice-to-disk for RUSTC_ICE=0 users) - rust-lang#128910 (Differentiate between methods and associated functions in diagnostics) - rust-lang#128923 ([rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fmease
reviewed
Aug 10, 2024
trait_, | ||
rendering_params, | ||
); | ||
if !impl_.is_negative_trait_impl() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From what I remember this check shouldn't actually be necessary contrary to the one further down but since this is temporary, it's fine.
I will elaborate on that in my upcoming PR.
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128923 - GuillaumeGomez:negative-impls-items, r=fmease [rustdoc] Stop showing impl items for negative impls Fixes rust-lang#128799. As discussed with `@fmease,` they have a broader patch in progress, so this (small) PR will at least allow for them to have a regression test. :) r? `@fmease`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #128799.
As discussed with @fmease, they have a broader patch in progress, so this (small) PR will at least allow for them to have a regression test. :)
r? @fmease