-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #127125
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #127125
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It is only implemented for a single type. Directly passing this type is simpler and avoids overhead from indirect calls.
It can be retrieved from the Session too.
They are not representable by Cranelift
…ypes on function signature. Recommit after refactoring based on comment: rust-lang#126017 (comment) But when changing return type's lifetime to `ReError` will affect the subsequent borrow check process and cause test11 in typeck_type_placeholder_item.rs to lost E0515 message. ```rust fn test11(x: &usize) -> &_ { //~^ ERROR the placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures for return types &x //~ ERROR cannot return reference to function parameter(this E0515 msg will disappear) } ```
…beta/stable channel
… `static` variable. fixes rust-lang#126789
…ler-errors Various rustc_codegen_ssa cleanups
Improve error message in tidy The old error message was wrong (there is no `venv` Python package on PyPi), and we did not specify the correct Python path in the error message.
…-ozkan Implement `x perf` as a separate tool Continues work from rust-lang#126318, adds a CLI for running `rustc-perf` profiling commands through a new `rustc-perf-wrapper` tool. The CLI is in a separate tool to enable experimentation outside of `bootstrap`. This is probably most of what we can do so far, I'll add support for benchmarking once `rustc-perf` gets a terminal output for comparing benchmark results. r? `@onur-ozkan`
…-ozkan Make mtime of reproducible tarballs dependent on git commit Since rust-lang#123246, our tarballs should be fully reproducible. That means that the mtime of all files and directories in the tarballs is set to the date of the first Rust commit (from 2006). However, this is causing some mtime invalidation issues (rust-lang#125578 (comment)). Ideally, we would like to keep the mtime reproducible, but still update it with new versions of Rust. That's what this PR does. It modifies the tarball installer bootstrap invocation so that if the current rustc directory is managed by git, we will set the UTC timestamp of the latest commit as the mtime for all files in the archive. This means that the archive should be still fully reproducible from a given commit SHA, but it will also be changed with new beta bumps and `download-rustc` versions. Note that only files are set to this mtime, directories are still set to the year 2006, because the `tar` library used by `rust-installer` doesn't allow us to selectively override mtime for directories (or at least I haven't found it). We could work around that by doing all the mtime modifications in bootstrap, but that would require more changes. I think/hope that just modifying the file mtimes should be enough. It should at least fix cargo `rustc` mtime invalidation. Fixes: rust-lang#125578 r? `@onur-ozkan`
Add a run-make test that LLD is not being used by default on the x64 beta/stable channel rust-lang#126701 showed that the handling of `lld` in bootstrap is currently not ideal. While it would be nice to refactor it eventually, we should also make sure that we have a test that checks that `lld` is not used (yet!) by default on the x64 Linux stable channel. CC `@lqd` r? `@onur-ozkan`
…locks-diagnostics, r=compiler-errors Improve unsafe extern blocks diagnostics Closes rust-lang#126327 For this code: ```rust extern { pub fn foo(); pub safe fn bar(); } ``` We get ... ``` error: items in unadorned `extern` blocks cannot have safety qualifiers --> test.rs:3:5 | 3 | pub safe fn bar(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | help: add unsafe to this `extern` block | 1 | unsafe extern { | ++++++ error[E0658]: `unsafe extern {}` blocks and `safe` keyword are experimental --> test.rs:3:9 | 3 | pub safe fn bar(); | ^^^^ | = note: see issue rust-lang#123743 <rust-lang#123743> for more information = help: add `#![feature(unsafe_extern_blocks)]` to the crate attributes to enable error: aborting due to 2 previous errors For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`. ``` And then making the extern block unsafe, we get ... ``` error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe --> test.rs:1:1 | 1 | unsafe extern { | ^^^^^^ | = note: see issue rust-lang#123743 <rust-lang#123743> for more information = help: add `#![feature(unsafe_extern_blocks)]` to the crate attributes to enable error: items in unadorned `extern` blocks cannot have safety qualifiers --> test.rs:3:5 | 3 | pub safe fn bar(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error[E0658]: `unsafe extern {}` blocks and `safe` keyword are experimental --> test.rs:3:9 | 3 | pub safe fn bar(); | ^^^^ | = note: see issue rust-lang#123743 <rust-lang#123743> for more information = help: add `#![feature(unsafe_extern_blocks)]` to the crate attributes to enable error: aborting due to 3 previous errors For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`. ``` r? `@compiler-errors`
…-errors Fix a error suggestion for E0121 when using placeholder _ as return types on function signature. Recommit after refactoring based on comment: rust-lang#126017 (comment) But when changing return type's lifetime to `ReError` will affect the subsequent borrow check process and cause test11 in typeck_type_placeholder_item.rs to lost E0515 message. ```rust fn test11(x: &usize) -> &_ { //~^ ERROR the placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures for return types &x //~ ERROR cannot return reference to function parameter(this E0515 msg will disappear) } ``` fixes rust-lang#125488 r? `@pnkfelix`
fix: prefer `(*p).clone` to `p.clone` if the `p` is a raw pointer Fixes rust-lang#126863 I wonder if there is a better way to solve the regression problem of this test case: `tests/ui/borrowck/issue-20801.rs`. It's okay to drop the dereference symbol in this scenario. But it's not correct in rust-lang#126863 ``` help: consider removing the dereference here | 5 - let inner: String = *p; 5 + let inner: String = p; ``` I haven't found out how to tell if clone pointer is allowed, i.e. no type mismatch occurs
Show `used attribute`'s kind for user when find it isn't applied to a `static` variable. For example : ```rust extern "C" { #[used] //~ ERROR attribute must be applied to a `static` variable static FOO: i32; // show the kind of this item to help user understand why the error is reported. } ``` fixes rust-lang#126789
rustbot
added
A-meta
Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself
A-run-make
Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs
labels
Jun 29, 2024
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Jun 29, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 29, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123237 (Various rustc_codegen_ssa cleanups) - rust-lang#126960 (Improve error message in tidy) - rust-lang#127002 (Implement `x perf` as a separate tool) - rust-lang#127050 (Make mtime of reproducible tarballs dependent on git commit) - rust-lang#127081 (Add a run-make test that LLD is not being used by default on the x64 beta/stable channel) - rust-lang#127106 (Improve unsafe extern blocks diagnostics) - rust-lang#127110 (Fix a error suggestion for E0121 when using placeholder _ as return types on function signature.) - rust-lang#127114 (fix: prefer `(*p).clone` to `p.clone` if the `p` is a raw pointer) - rust-lang#127118 (Show `used attribute`'s kind for user when find it isn't applied to a `static` variable.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jun 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta
Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself
A-run-make
Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
x perf
as a separate tool #127002 (Implementx perf
as a separate tool)(*p).clone
top.clone
if thep
is a raw pointer #127114 (fix: prefer(*p).clone
top.clone
if thep
is a raw pointer)used attribute
's kind for user when find it isn't applied to astatic
variable. #127118 (Showused attribute
's kind for user when find it isn't applied to astatic
variable.)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup