- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
          Fix assertion failure for some Expect diagnostics.
          #126719
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    In rust-lang#120699 I moved some code dealing with `has_future_breakage` earlier in `emit_diagnostic`. Issue rust-lang#126521 identified a case where that reordering was invalid (leading to an assertion failure) for some `Expect` diagnostics. This commit partially undoes the change, by moving the handling of unstable `Expect` diagnostics earlier again. This makes `emit_diagnostic` a bit uglier, but is necessary to fix the problem. Fixes rust-lang#126521.
| @bors r+ rollup | 
    
  matthiaskrgr 
      added a commit
        to matthiaskrgr/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 20, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Fix assertion failure for some `Expect` diagnostics. In rust-lang#120699 I moved some code dealing with `has_future_breakage` earlier in `emit_diagnostic`. Issue rust-lang#126521 identified a case where that reordering was invalid (leading to an assertion failure) for some `Expect` diagnostics. This commit partially undoes the change, by moving the handling of unstable `Expect` diagnostics earlier again. This makes `emit_diagnostic` a bit uglier, but is necessary to fix the problem. Fixes rust-lang#126521. r? `@oli-obk`
  This was referenced Jun 20, 2024 
      
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 20, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#126380 (Add std Xtensa targets support) - rust-lang#126636 (Resolve Clippy `f16` and `f128` `unimplemented!`/`FIXME`s ) - rust-lang#126659 (More status-quo tests for the `#[coverage(..)]` attribute) - rust-lang#126711 (Make Option::as_[mut_]slice const) - rust-lang#126717 (Clean up some comments near `use` declarations) - rust-lang#126719 (Fix assertion failure for some `Expect` diagnostics.) - rust-lang#126730 (Add opaque type corner case test) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  rust-timer 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 20, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126719 - nnethercote:fix-126521, r=oli-obk Fix assertion failure for some `Expect` diagnostics. In rust-lang#120699 I moved some code dealing with `has_future_breakage` earlier in `emit_diagnostic`. Issue rust-lang#126521 identified a case where that reordering was invalid (leading to an assertion failure) for some `Expect` diagnostics. This commit partially undoes the change, by moving the handling of unstable `Expect` diagnostics earlier again. This makes `emit_diagnostic` a bit uglier, but is necessary to fix the problem. Fixes rust-lang#126521. r? ``@oli-obk``
    
  nnethercote 
      added a commit
        to nnethercote/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 21, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Very similar to rust-lang#126719. So much so that I added a new case to the test from that PR rather than creating a new one.
    
  matthiaskrgr 
      added a commit
        to matthiaskrgr/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 21, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Fix another assertion failure for some Expect diagnostics. Very similar to rust-lang#126719. So much so that I added a new case to the test from that PR rather than creating a new one. r? `@oli-obk`
    
  rust-timer 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 21, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126774 - nnethercote:fix-126751, r=oli-obk Fix another assertion failure for some Expect diagnostics. Very similar to rust-lang#126719. So much so that I added a new case to the test from that PR rather than creating a new one. r? `@oli-obk`
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  
    T-compiler
  Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
In #120699 I moved some code dealing with
has_future_breakageearlier inemit_diagnostic. Issue #126521 identified a case where that reordering was invalid (leading to an assertion failure) for someExpectdiagnostics.This commit partially undoes the change, by moving the handling of unstable
Expectdiagnostics earlier again. This makesemit_diagnostica bit uglier, but is necessary to fix the problem.Fixes #126521.
r? @oli-obk