-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Represent type-level consts with new-and-improved hir::ConstArg
#125915
Conversation
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy HIR ty lowering was modified cc @fmease |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
5819f98
to
9d6aa97
Compare
d9dc960
to
98df547
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ConstArgKind
varianthir::ConstArg
1755fdf
to
4bea486
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
486af6c
to
405f7de
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Finished benchmarking commit (8c3a94a): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResults (primary 2.2%, secondary 2.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResults (primary -0.1%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 768.827s -> 770.782s (0.25%) |
Represent type-level consts with new-and-improved `hir::ConstArg` ### Summary This is a step toward `min_generic_const_exprs`. We now represent all const generic arguments using an enum that differentiates between const *paths* (temporarily just bare const params) and arbitrary anon consts that may perform computations. This will enable us to cleanly implement the `min_generic_const_args` plan of allowing the use of generics in paths used as const args, while disallowing their use in arbitrary anon consts. Here is a summary of the salient aspects of this change: - Add `current_def_id_parent` to `LoweringContext` This is needed to track anon const parents properly once we implement `ConstArgKind::Path` (which requires moving anon const def-creation outside of `DefCollector`). - Create `hir::ConstArgKind` enum with `Path` and `Anon` variants. Use it in the existing `hir::ConstArg` struct, replacing the previous `hir::AnonConst` field. - Use `ConstArg` for all instances of const args. Specifically, use it instead of `AnonConst` for assoc item constraints, array lengths, and const param defaults. - Some `ast::AnonConst`s now have their `DefId`s created in rustc_ast_lowering rather than `DefCollector`. This is because in some cases they will end up becoming a `ConstArgKind::Path` instead, which has no `DefId`. We have to solve this in a hacky way where we guess whether the `AnonConst` could end up as a path const since we can't know for sure until after name resolution (`N` could refer to a free const or a nullary struct). If it has no chance as being a const param, then we create a `DefId` in `DefCollector` -- otherwise we decide during ast_lowering. This will have to be updated once all path consts use `ConstArgKind::Path`. - We explicitly use `ConstArgHasType` for array lengths, rather than implicitly relying on anon const type feeding -- this is due to the addition of `ConstArgKind::Path`. - Some tests have their outputs changed, but the changes are for the most part minor (including removing duplicate or almost-duplicate errors). One test now ICEs, but it is for an incomplete, unstable feature and is now tracked at rust-lang#127009. ### Followup items post-merge - Use `ConstArgKind::Path` for all const paths, not just const params. - Fix (no github dont close this issue) rust-lang#127009 - If a path in generic args doesn't resolve as a type, try to resolve as a const instead (do this in rustc_resolve). Then remove the special-casing from `rustc_ast_lowering`, so that all params will automatically be lowered as `ConstArgKind::Path`. - (?) Consider making `const_evaluatable_unchecked` a hard error, or at least trying it in crater r? `@BoxyUwU`
[beta] backports and bump stage0 - Disable jump threading of float equality rust-lang#128271 - Normalize when equating `dyn` tails in MIR borrowck rust-lang#128694 - Improve `Ord` violation help rust-lang#128273 - bump stage0 to stable 1.80.1 - Revert rust-lang#125915 on beta rust-lang#128760 - derive(SmartPointer): register helper attributes rust-lang#128925 - Fix bug in `Parser::look_ahead`. rust-lang#128994 r? cuviper
Ever since rust-lang#125915, some `ast::AnonConst`s turn into `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`s, which don't have associated `DefId`s. To deal with the fact that we don't have resolution information in `DefCollector`, we decided to implement a process where if the anon const *appeared* to be trivial (i.e., `N` or `{ N }`), we would avoid creating a def for it in `DefCollector`. If later, in AST lowering, we realized it turned out to be a unit struct literal, or we were lowering it to something that didn't use `hir::ConstArg`, we'd create its def there. However, let's say we have a macro `m!()` that expands to a reference to a free constant `FOO`. If we use `m!()` in the body of an anon const (e.g., `Foo<{ m!() }>`), then in def collection, it appears to be a nontrivial anon const and we create a def. But the macro expands to something that looks like a trivial const arg, but is not, so in AST lowering we "fix" the mistake we assumed def collection made and create a def for it. This causes a duplicate definition ICE. The long-term fix for this is to delay the creation of defs for all expression-like nodes until AST lowering (see rust-lang#128844 for an incomplete attempt at this). This would avoid issues like this one that are caused by hacky workarounds. However, doing this uncovers a pre-existing bug with opaque types that is quite involved to fix (see rust-lang#129023). In the meantime, this PR fixes the bug by delaying def creation for anon consts whose bodies are macro invocations until after we expand the macro and know what is inside it. This is accomplished by adding information to create the anon const's def to the data in `Resolver.invocation_parents`.
…h, r=cjgillot Retroactively feature gate `ConstArgKind::Path` This puts the lowering introduced by rust-lang#125915 under a feature gate until we fix the regressions introduced by it. Alternative to whole sale reverting the PR since it didn't seem like a very clean revert and I think this is generally a step in the right direction and don't want to get stuck landing and reverting the PR over and over :) cc rust-lang#129137 `@camelid,` tests taken from there. beta is branching soon so I think it makes sense to not try and rush that fix through since it wont have much time to bake and if it has issues we can't simply revert it on beta. Fixes rust-lang#128016
…h, r=cjgillot Retroactively feature gate `ConstArgKind::Path` This puts the lowering introduced by rust-lang#125915 under a feature gate until we fix the regressions introduced by it. Alternative to whole sale reverting the PR since it didn't seem like a very clean revert and I think this is generally a step in the right direction and don't want to get stuck landing and reverting the PR over and over :) cc rust-lang#129137 ``@camelid,`` tests taken from there. beta is branching soon so I think it makes sense to not try and rush that fix through since it wont have much time to bake and if it has issues we can't simply revert it on beta. Fixes rust-lang#128016
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129246 - BoxyUwU:feature_gate_const_arg_path, r=cjgillot Retroactively feature gate `ConstArgKind::Path` This puts the lowering introduced by rust-lang#125915 under a feature gate until we fix the regressions introduced by it. Alternative to whole sale reverting the PR since it didn't seem like a very clean revert and I think this is generally a step in the right direction and don't want to get stuck landing and reverting the PR over and over :) cc rust-lang#129137 ``@camelid,`` tests taken from there. beta is branching soon so I think it makes sense to not try and rush that fix through since it wont have much time to bake and if it has issues we can't simply revert it on beta. Fixes rust-lang#128016
Ever since rust-lang#125915, some `ast::AnonConst`s turn into `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`s, which don't have associated `DefId`s. To deal with the fact that we don't have resolution information in `DefCollector`, we decided to implement a process where if the anon const *appeared* to be trivial (i.e., `N` or `{ N }`), we would avoid creating a def for it in `DefCollector`. If later, in AST lowering, we realized it turned out to be a unit struct literal, or we were lowering it to something that didn't use `hir::ConstArg`, we'd create its def there. However, let's say we have a macro `m!()` that expands to a reference to a free constant `FOO`. If we use `m!()` in the body of an anon const (e.g., `Foo<{ m!() }>`), then in def collection, it appears to be a nontrivial anon const and we create a def. But the macro expands to something that looks like a trivial const arg, but is not, so in AST lowering we "fix" the mistake we assumed def collection made and create a def for it. This causes a duplicate definition ICE. The long-term fix for this is to delay the creation of defs for all expression-like nodes until AST lowering (see rust-lang#128844 for an incomplete attempt at this). This would avoid issues like this one that are caused by hacky workarounds. However, doing this uncovers a pre-existing bug with opaque types that is quite involved to fix (see rust-lang#129023). In the meantime, this PR fixes the bug by delaying def creation for anon consts whose bodies are macro invocations until after we expand the macro and know what is inside it. This is accomplished by adding information to create the anon const's def to the data in `Resolver.invocation_parents`.
Ever since rust-lang#125915, some `ast::AnonConst`s turn into `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`s, which don't have associated `DefId`s. To deal with the fact that we don't have resolution information in `DefCollector`, we decided to implement a process where if the anon const *appeared* to be trivial (i.e., `N` or `{ N }`), we would avoid creating a def for it in `DefCollector`. If later, in AST lowering, we realized it turned out to be a unit struct literal, or we were lowering it to something that didn't use `hir::ConstArg`, we'd create its def there. However, let's say we have a macro `m!()` that expands to a reference to a free constant `FOO`. If we use `m!()` in the body of an anon const (e.g., `Foo<{ m!() }>`), then in def collection, it appears to be a nontrivial anon const and we create a def. But the macro expands to something that looks like a trivial const arg, but is not, so in AST lowering we "fix" the mistake we assumed def collection made and create a def for it. This causes a duplicate definition ICE. The long-term fix for this is to delay the creation of defs for all expression-like nodes until AST lowering (see rust-lang#128844 for an incomplete attempt at this). This would avoid issues like this one that are caused by hacky workarounds. However, doing this uncovers a pre-existing bug with opaque types that is quite involved to fix (see rust-lang#129023). In the meantime, this PR fixes the bug by delaying def creation for anon consts whose bodies are macro invocations until after we expand the macro and know what is inside it. This is accomplished by adding information to create the anon const's def to the data in `Resolver.invocation_parents`.
Ever since rust-lang#125915, some `ast::AnonConst`s turn into `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`s, which don't have associated `DefId`s. To deal with the fact that we don't have resolution information in `DefCollector`, we decided to implement a process where if the anon const *appeared* to be trivial (i.e., `N` or `{ N }`), we would avoid creating a def for it in `DefCollector`. If later, in AST lowering, we realized it turned out to be a unit struct literal, or we were lowering it to something that didn't use `hir::ConstArg`, we'd create its def there. However, let's say we have a macro `m!()` that expands to a reference to a free constant `FOO`. If we use `m!()` in the body of an anon const (e.g., `Foo<{ m!() }>`), then in def collection, it appears to be a nontrivial anon const and we create a def. But the macro expands to something that looks like a trivial const arg, but is not, so in AST lowering we "fix" the mistake we assumed def collection made and create a def for it. This causes a duplicate definition ICE. The ideal long-term fix for this is a bit unclear. One option is to delay def creation for all expression-like nodes until AST lowering (see rust-lang#128844 for an incomplete attempt at this). This would avoid issues like this one that are caused by hacky workarounds. However, this approach has some downsides as well, and the best approach is yet to be determined. In the meantime, this PR fixes the bug by delaying def creation for anon consts whose bodies are macro invocations until after we expand the macro and know what is inside it. This is accomplished by adding information to create the anon const's def to the data in `Resolver.invocation_parents`.
Ever since rust-lang#125915, some `ast::AnonConst`s turn into `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`s, which don't have associated `DefId`s. To deal with the fact that we don't have resolution information in `DefCollector`, we decided to implement a process where if the anon const *appeared* to be trivial (i.e., `N` or `{ N }`), we would avoid creating a def for it in `DefCollector`. If later, in AST lowering, we realized it turned out to be a unit struct literal, or we were lowering it to something that didn't use `hir::ConstArg`, we'd create its def there. However, let's say we have a macro `m!()` that expands to a reference to a free constant `FOO`. If we use `m!()` in the body of an anon const (e.g., `Foo<{ m!() }>`), then in def collection, it appears to be a nontrivial anon const and we create a def. But the macro expands to something that looks like a trivial const arg, but is not, so in AST lowering we "fix" the mistake we assumed def collection made and create a def for it. This causes a duplicate definition ICE. The ideal long-term fix for this is a bit unclear. One option is to delay def creation for all expression-like nodes until AST lowering (see rust-lang#128844 for an incomplete attempt at this). This would avoid issues like this one that are caused by hacky workarounds. However, this approach has some downsides as well, and the best approach is yet to be determined. In the meantime, this PR fixes the bug by delaying def creation for anon consts whose bodies are macro invocations until after we expand the macro and know what is inside it. This is accomplished by adding information to create the anon const's def to the data in `Resolver.invocation_parents`.
Ever since rust-lang#125915, some `ast::AnonConst`s turn into `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`s, which don't have associated `DefId`s. To deal with the fact that we don't have resolution information in `DefCollector`, we decided to implement a process where if the anon const *appeared* to be trivial (i.e., `N` or `{ N }`), we would avoid creating a def for it in `DefCollector`. If later, in AST lowering, we realized it turned out to be a unit struct literal, or we were lowering it to something that didn't use `hir::ConstArg`, we'd create its def there. However, let's say we have a macro `m!()` that expands to a reference to a free constant `FOO`. If we use `m!()` in the body of an anon const (e.g., `Foo<{ m!() }>`), then in def collection, it appears to be a nontrivial anon const and we create a def. But the macro expands to something that looks like a trivial const arg, but is not, so in AST lowering we "fix" the mistake we assumed def collection made and create a def for it. This causes a duplicate definition ICE. The ideal long-term fix for this is a bit unclear. One option is to delay def creation for all expression-like nodes until AST lowering (see rust-lang#128844 for an incomplete attempt at this). This would avoid issues like this one that are caused by hacky workarounds. However, this approach has some downsides as well, and the best approach is yet to be determined. In the meantime, this PR fixes the bug by delaying def creation for anon consts whose bodies are macro invocations until after we expand the macro and know what is inside it. This is accomplished by adding information to create the anon const's def to the data in `Resolver.invocation_parents`.
Fix anon const def-creation when macros are involved Fixes rust-lang#128016. Ever since rust-lang#125915, some `ast::AnonConst`s turn into `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`s, which don't have associated `DefId`s. To deal with the fact that we don't have resolution information in `DefCollector`, we decided to implement a process where if the anon const *appeared* to be trivial (i.e., `N` or `{ N }`), we would avoid creating a def for it in `DefCollector`. If later, in AST lowering, we realized it turned out to be a unit struct literal, or we were lowering it to something that didn't use `hir::ConstArg`, we'd create its def there. However, let's say we have a macro `m!()` that expands to a reference to a free constant `FOO`. If we use `m!()` in the body of an anon const (e.g., `Foo<{ m!() }>`), then in def collection, it appears to be a nontrivial anon const and we create a def. But the macro expands to something that looks like a trivial const arg, but is not, so in AST lowering we "fix" the mistake we assumed def collection made and create a def for it. This causes a duplicate definition ICE. The long-term fix for this is to delay the creation of defs for all expression-like nodes until AST lowering (see rust-lang#128844 for an incomplete attempt at this). This would avoid issues like this one that are caused by hacky workarounds. However, doing this uncovers a pre-existing bug with opaque types that is quite involved to fix (see rust-lang#129023). In the meantime, this PR fixes the bug by delaying def creation for anon consts whose bodies are macro invocations until after we expand the macro and know what is inside it. This is accomplished by adding information to create the anon const's def to the data in `Resolver.invocation_parents`. r? `@BoxyUwU`
Ever since rust-lang#125915, some `ast::AnonConst`s turn into `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`s, which don't have associated `DefId`s. To deal with the fact that we don't have resolution information in `DefCollector`, we decided to implement a process where if the anon const *appeared* to be trivial (i.e., `N` or `{ N }`), we would avoid creating a def for it in `DefCollector`. If later, in AST lowering, we realized it turned out to be a unit struct literal, or we were lowering it to something that didn't use `hir::ConstArg`, we'd create its def there. However, let's say we have a macro `m!()` that expands to a reference to a free constant `FOO`. If we use `m!()` in the body of an anon const (e.g., `Foo<{ m!() }>`), then in def collection, it appears to be a nontrivial anon const and we create a def. But the macro expands to something that looks like a trivial const arg, but is not, so in AST lowering we "fix" the mistake we assumed def collection made and create a def for it. This causes a duplicate definition ICE. The ideal long-term fix for this is a bit unclear. One option is to delay def creation for all expression-like nodes until AST lowering (see rust-lang#128844 for an incomplete attempt at this). This would avoid issues like this one that are caused by hacky workarounds. However, this approach has some downsides as well, and the best approach is yet to be determined. In the meantime, this PR fixes the bug by delaying def creation for anon consts whose bodies are macro invocations until after we expand the macro and know what is inside it. This is accomplished by adding information to create the anon const's def to the data in `Resolver.invocation_parents`.
Summary
This is a step toward
min_generic_const_exprs
. We now represent all constgeneric arguments using an enum that differentiates between const paths
(temporarily just bare const params) and arbitrary anon consts that may perform
computations. This will enable us to cleanly implement the
min_generic_const_args
plan of allowing the use of generics in paths used as const args, while
disallowing their use in arbitrary anon consts. Here is a summary of the salient
aspects of this change:
Add
current_def_id_parent
toLoweringContext
This is needed to track anon const parents properly once we implement
ConstArgKind::Path
(which requires moving anon const def-creationoutside of
DefCollector
).Create
hir::ConstArgKind
enum withPath
andAnon
variants. Use it in theexisting
hir::ConstArg
struct, replacing the previoushir::AnonConst
field.Use
ConstArg
for all instances of const args. Specifically, use it insteadof
AnonConst
for assoc item constraints, array lengths, and const paramdefaults.
Some
ast::AnonConst
s now have theirDefId
s created inrustc_ast_lowering rather than
DefCollector
. This is because in somecases they will end up becoming a
ConstArgKind::Path
instead, whichhas no
DefId
. We have to solve this in a hacky way where we guesswhether the
AnonConst
could end up as a path const since we can'tknow for sure until after name resolution (
N
could refer to a freeconst or a nullary struct). If it has no chance as being a const
param, then we create a
DefId
inDefCollector
-- otherwise wedecide during ast_lowering. This will have to be updated once all path
consts use
ConstArgKind::Path
.We explicitly use
ConstArgHasType
for array lengths, rather thanimplicitly relying on anon const type feeding -- this is due to the
addition of
ConstArgKind::Path
.Some tests have their outputs changed, but the changes are for the
most part minor (including removing duplicate or almost-duplicate
errors). One test now ICEs, but it is for an incomplete, unstable
feature and is now tracked at ICE(non_lifetime_binders): const bound params not handled correctly #127009.
Followup items post-merge
ConstArgKind::Path
for all const paths, not just const params.r? @BoxyUwU