Make suggest_deref_closure_return more idiomatic/easier to understand
#123990
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
compiler-errors
commented
Apr 15, 2024
| ); | ||
| let closure_kind = args.as_closure().kind(); | ||
| let closure_kind_ty = Ty::from_closure_kind(tcx, closure_kind); | ||
| let tupled_upvars_ty = self.infcx.next_ty_var(TypeVariableOrigin { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No idea why a new var was being synthesized here rather than just getting the upvars out of the closure type we have.
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #123991) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
suggest-closure-ret-deref
branch
from
0c40114 to
00838b3
Compare
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120781 (Correct usage note on OpenOptions::append()) - rust-lang#121694 (sess: stabilize `-Zrelro-level` as `-Crelro-level`) - rust-lang#122521 (doc(bootstrap): add top-level doc-comment to utils/tarball.rs) - rust-lang#123491 (Fix ICE in `eval_body_using_ecx`) - rust-lang#123574 (rustdoc: rename `issue-\d+.rs` tests to have meaningful names (part 6)) - rust-lang#123687 (Update ar_archive_writer to 0.2.0) - rust-lang#123721 (Various visionOS fixes) - rust-lang#123797 (Better graphviz output for SCCs and NLL constraints) - rust-lang#123990 (Make `suggest_deref_closure_return` more idiomatic/easier to understand) - rust-lang#123995 (Make `thir_tree` and `thir_flat` into hooks) - rust-lang#123998 (Opaque types have no namespace) - rust-lang#124001 (Fix docs for unstable_features lint.) - rust-lang#124006 (Move size assertions for `mir::syntax` types into the same file) - rust-lang#124011 (rustdoc: update the module-level docs of `rustdoc::clean`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123990 - compiler-errors:suggest-closure-ret-deref, r=oli-obk Make `suggest_deref_closure_return` more idiomatic/easier to understand The only functional change here really is just making it not use a fresh type variable for upvars. I'll point that out in the code. The rest of the changes are just stylistic, because reading this code was really confusing me (variable names were vague, ways of accessing types were unidiomatic, order of operations was kind of strange, etc). This is stacked on rust-lang#123989. r? oli-obk since you approved rust-lang#122213
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The only functional change here really is just making it not use a fresh type variable for upvars. I'll point that out in the code.
The rest of the changes are just stylistic, because reading this code was really confusing me (variable names were vague, ways of accessing types were unidiomatic, order of operations was kind of strange, etc).
This is stacked on #123989.
r? oli-obk since you approved #122213