-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect #121338
Merged
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
jieyouxu:ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons_suggestion
Feb 21, 2024
Merged
Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect #121338
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
jieyouxu:ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons_suggestion
Feb 21, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… a .fixed file exists
r? @Nadrieril rustbot has assigned @Nadrieril. Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer |
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Feb 20, 2024
Urgau
reviewed
Feb 20, 2024
tests/ui/lint/ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons_suggestions.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jieyouxu
force-pushed
the
ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons_suggestion
branch
from
February 20, 2024 12:11
49025fa
to
0e58333
Compare
jieyouxu
changed the title
Ambiguous wide pointer comparisons suggestion
Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestion to MaybeIncorrect
Feb 20, 2024
jieyouxu
changed the title
Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestion to MaybeIncorrect
Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect
Feb 20, 2024
Nadrieril
reviewed
Feb 20, 2024
Looks good! One nit, r=me after that. @bors rollup=always |
…rrect It is possible to have more than one valid suggestion, which when applied together via rustfix causes the code to no longer compile. This is a temporary workaround; the real long term solution to these issues is to solve <rust-lang#53934>.
jieyouxu
force-pushed
the
ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons_suggestion
branch
from
February 20, 2024 17:21
0e58333
to
4d386d9
Compare
Thank you for fixing this! @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 20, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121208 (Convert `delayed_bug`s to `bug`s.) - rust-lang#121288 (make rustc_expand translatable) - rust-lang#121304 (Add docs for extension proc-macro) - rust-lang#121328 (Make --verbose imply -Z write-long-types-to-disk=no) - rust-lang#121338 (Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect) - rust-lang#121361 (diagnostic items for legacy numeric modules) - rust-lang#121375 (Print proper relative path for descriptive name check) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121338 - jieyouxu:ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons_suggestion, r=Nadrieril Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect In certain cases like rust-lang#121330, it is possible to have more than one suggestion from the `ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons` lint (which before this PR are `MachineApplicable`). When this gets passed to rustfix, rustfix makes *multiple* changes according to the suggestions which result in incorrect code. This is a temporary workaround. The real long term solution to problems like these is to address <rust-lang#53934>. This PR also includes a drive-by edit to the panic message emitted by compiletest because "ui" test suite now uses `//`@`` directives. Fixes rust-lang#121330.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In certain cases like #121330, it is possible to have more than one suggestion from the
ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons
lint (which before this PR areMachineApplicable
). When this gets passed to rustfix, rustfix makes multiple changes according to the suggestions which result in incorrect code.This is a temporary workaround. The real long term solution to problems like these is to address #53934.
This PR also includes a drive-by edit to the panic message emitted by compiletest because "ui" test suite now uses
//@
directives.Fixes #121330.