ci update freebsd version proposal, freebsd 12 being eol #120869

devnexen · 2024-02-10T05:27:03Z

raising to the lowest still active supported freebsd version.
From 13.1 (already eol too), freebsd introduces a cpu affinity layer
with linux. It also introduces a api compatible copy_file_range which
can be used like its linux's counterpart.
The former is essential to build #120589, therefore breaks the backward
compatibility with the previous FreeBSD releases.

Blocked on #130465

rustbot · 2024-02-10T05:27:10Z

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Noratrieb · 2024-02-10T11:04:22Z

Does this mean that the minimum supported version is raised? Or is freebsd backwards-compatible so that builds against a new version still run on the old versiom? (A thing that's, for example, not true for linux glibc).
Can you edit the description to describe the impact of this change this way?

Mark-Simulacrum · 2024-02-11T01:59:03Z

@rustbot author

Please update the PR description with details that @Nilstrieb asked for. It would probably also be a good idea to reflect in the platform support page (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support.md) the target details if this does raise the minimum, so that users have something to reference for future Rust versions.

devnexen · 2024-02-11T22:42:32Z

@rustbot review

Noratrieb · 2024-02-12T16:58:51Z

What is the current minimum freebsd version supported by rustc? The platform support doc page doesn't document this.

devnexen · 2024-02-12T21:11:51Z

I would say freebsd 12.

Noratrieb · 2024-02-13T21:00:02Z

Thank you for adding it! Not in this PR, but it would be nice if you could add a new target documentation page in platform-support in src/doc/rustc for freebsd, adding yourself as the target maintainer (if you're interested) :).

I just looked it up, the last FreeBSD bump was #97944. It didn't include a blog post (which we do for bumps of more popular targets), so that seems fine. It superseded #89083 which contains more information.

Looks like we use FreeBSD artifacts on our CI mirror, so @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else with permissions) will have to upload them first before this can be merged.

Mark-Simulacrum · 2024-02-18T16:15:22Z

I've put the artifacts in our mirror (2024-02-18-freebsd-13.2-i386-base.txz and 2024-02-18-freebsd-13.2-amd64-base.txz). Please update the download file to match those, and then we can move ahead.

devnexen · 2024-02-19T12:42:20Z

@rustbot review

Mark-Simulacrum · 2024-02-24T14:21:20Z

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

bors · 2024-02-24T14:21:23Z

📌 Commit 42d5b87 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2024-02-24T14:21:24Z

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 50. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

Mark-Simulacrum · 2024-10-20T17:44:12Z

@bors r+

bors · 2024-10-20T17:44:15Z

📌 Commit 65f05af has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2024-10-21T00:13:13Z

⌛ Testing commit 65f05af with merge fb32dd4...

bors · 2024-10-21T03:45:21Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing fb32dd4 to master...

rust-timer · 2024-10-21T05:05:40Z

Finished benchmarking commit (fb32dd4): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -3.1%, secondary -2.7%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.1%, -3.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-4.1%, -1.6%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.1%	[-3.1%, -3.1%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 781.834s -> 781.459s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 333.76 MiB -> 333.77 MiB (0.00%)

taiki-e · 2024-10-25T19:55:12Z

It seems that Cargo distributed by rustup is causing segmentation fault after this change...

taiki-e · 2024-10-23T17:27:57Z

src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support.md

-`powerpc64-unknown-freebsd` | ✓ | ✓ | PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2)
-`powerpc64le-unknown-freebsd` |   |   | PPC64LE FreeBSD
-`powerpc-unknown-freebsd` |   |   | PowerPC FreeBSD
+`powerpc64-unknown-freebsd` | ✓ | ✓ | PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2)


PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2)

It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist.

https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/

powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. e4399d169acc

Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target.

rust/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs

Lines 102 to 111 in be01dab

let abi = if cx.target_spec().env == "musl" {

ELFv2

} else if cx.target_spec().os == "aix" {

AIX

} else {

match cx.data_layout().endian {

Endian::Big => ELFv1,

Endian::Little => ELFv2,

}

};

Filed #132150 for this.

beetrees · 2024-10-25T20:42:31Z

It seems that Cargo distributed by rustup is causing segmentation fault after this change...

https://github.com/taiki-e/test/actions/runs/11452067995/job/31862320725#step:3:522

Broken CI target for freebsd nightly ChanTsune/Portable-Network-Archive#1158

Pinging target maintainers from #129220: @asomers @MikaelUrankar

asomers · 2024-10-26T03:17:39Z

@beetrees I don't think this PR is responsible for that failure. See #132185 .

taiki-e · 2024-10-26T04:52:18Z

#132185

I've managed to bisect the problem. It was introduced by rust-lang/rust@6d88158 . I don't know why yet.

Hmm. AFAIK the segfault has been occurring consistently since nightly-2024-10-22 and that commit was merged in 2024-10-20 (#131772 (comment)), so it is odd that the problem is not occurring in nightly-2024-10-21, which supposedly contains that commit...

nightly-2024-10-21 (pass) https://github.com/taiki-e/test/actions/runs/11432053947/job/31801913647#step:3:395
nightly-2024-10-22 (fail) https://github.com/taiki-e/test/actions/runs/11452067995/job/31862320725#step:3:397

asomers · 2024-10-26T14:40:10Z

I don't know, @taiki-e . But I can reproduce the problem using a stage0 toolchain built at 6d88158 , but not with one built at 6d88158^ .

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 `@rustbot` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 ``@rustbot`` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 ```@rustbot``` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 ````@rustbot```` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 `````@rustbot````` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 ``````@rustbot`````` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 ```````@rustbot``````` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 ````````@rustbot```````` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Rollup merge of rust-lang#132150 - taiki-e:ppc64-freebsd-abi, r=pnkfelix Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 ````````@rustbot```````` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI Note that FreeBSD version bump may be reverted due to rust-lang/rust#120869 (comment). We may want to wait to merge this until that discussion is complete. Fixes rust-lang/rust#120869 (comment) > > PPC64 FreeBSD (ELFv1 and ELFv2, version 13.2) > > It seems odd that ELFv1 and 13.N coexist. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/ > > > powerpc64 switched to ELFv2 ABI at the same time it switched to LLVM. This brings us to a parity with modern Linux distributions. This also makes the binaries from previous FreeBSD versions incompatible with 13.0-RELEASE. Kernel still supports ELFv1, so jails and chroots using older FreeBSD versions are still compatible. [e4399d169acc](https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=e4399d169acc) > > Well, it is also odd that this target claims ELFv2 support since our ABI code does not use ELFv2 on this target. > > https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/be01dabfefd2daa4574b974f571c7852085d60cb/compiler/rustc_target/src/callconv/powerpc64.rs#L102-L111 ````````@rustbot```````` label +O-PowerPC +O-freebsd

rustbot assigned Mark-Simulacrum Feb 10, 2024

rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 10, 2024

devnexen force-pushed the update_fbsd_ci branch from 6123e25 to 4008e0e Compare February 10, 2024 12:57

Mark-Simulacrum added the relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. label Feb 11, 2024

rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 11, 2024

devnexen force-pushed the update_fbsd_ci branch from 4008e0e to a8a6822 Compare February 11, 2024 06:50

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 11, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 18, 2024

devnexen force-pushed the update_fbsd_ci branch 2 times, most recently from c7285bd to 42d5b87 Compare February 18, 2024 17:44

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 19, 2024

bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 24, 2024

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 20, 2024

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 21, 2024

bors merged commit fb32dd4 into rust-lang:master Oct 21, 2024
7 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Oct 21, 2024

ChanTsune mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2024

Broken CI target for freebsd nightly ChanTsune/Portable-Network-Archive#1158

Closed

taiki-e reviewed Oct 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

taiki-e mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2024

Fix powerpc64 big-endian FreeBSD ABI #132150

Merged

ehuss mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2024

FreeBSD segfault when capturing backtrace with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 #132185

Open

ChanTsune mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2024

Broken CI target for freebsd nightly Portable-Network-Archive/fs#152

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

ci update freebsd version proposal, freebsd 12 being eol #120869

ci update freebsd version proposal, freebsd 12 being eol #120869

devnexen commented Feb 10, 2024 •

edited by Dylan-DPC

Loading

rustbot commented Feb 10, 2024

Noratrieb commented Feb 10, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum commented Feb 11, 2024

devnexen commented Feb 11, 2024

Noratrieb commented Feb 12, 2024

devnexen commented Feb 12, 2024

Noratrieb commented Feb 13, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum commented Feb 18, 2024

devnexen commented Feb 19, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum commented Feb 24, 2024

bors commented Feb 24, 2024

bors commented Feb 24, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum commented Oct 20, 2024

bors commented Oct 20, 2024

bors commented Oct 21, 2024

bors commented Oct 21, 2024

rust-timer commented Oct 21, 2024

taiki-e commented Oct 25, 2024

taiki-e Oct 23, 2024 •

edited

Loading

taiki-e Oct 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

beetrees commented Oct 25, 2024

asomers commented Oct 26, 2024

taiki-e commented Oct 26, 2024

asomers commented Oct 26, 2024

	let abi = if cx.target_spec().env == "musl" {
	ELFv2
	} else if cx.target_spec().os == "aix" {
	AIX
	} else {
	match cx.data_layout().endian {
	Endian::Big => ELFv1,
	Endian::Little => ELFv2,
	}
	};

ci update freebsd version proposal, freebsd 12 being eol #120869

ci update freebsd version proposal, freebsd 12 being eol #120869

Conversation

devnexen commented Feb 10, 2024 • edited by Dylan-DPC Loading

rustbot commented Feb 10, 2024

Noratrieb commented Feb 10, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum commented Feb 11, 2024

devnexen commented Feb 11, 2024

Noratrieb commented Feb 12, 2024

devnexen commented Feb 12, 2024

Noratrieb commented Feb 13, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum commented Feb 18, 2024

devnexen commented Feb 19, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum commented Feb 24, 2024

bors commented Feb 24, 2024

bors commented Feb 24, 2024

Mark-Simulacrum commented Oct 20, 2024

bors commented Oct 20, 2024

bors commented Oct 21, 2024

bors commented Oct 21, 2024

rust-timer commented Oct 21, 2024

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Instruction count

Max RSS (memory usage)

Cycles

Binary size

taiki-e commented Oct 25, 2024

taiki-e Oct 23, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

taiki-e Oct 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

beetrees commented Oct 25, 2024

asomers commented Oct 26, 2024

taiki-e commented Oct 26, 2024

asomers commented Oct 26, 2024

devnexen commented Feb 10, 2024 •

edited by Dylan-DPC

Loading

taiki-e Oct 23, 2024 •

edited

Loading

taiki-e Oct 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading