- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
          Allow any const expression blocks in thread_local!
          #120181
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    Before making thread_local accept statements inside the const block,
this test would fail to compile as follows:
    error: no rules expected the token `let`
       --> library/std/tests/thread.rs:26:13
        |
    26  |             let value = 1;
        |             ^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call
        |
    note: while trying to match meta-variable `$init:expr`
       --> library/std/src/thread/local.rs:189:69
        |
    189 |     ($(#[$attr:meta])* $vis:vis static $name:ident: $t:ty = const { $init:expr }; $($rest:tt)*) => (
        |                                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^
    | r? @thomcc (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) | 
| @bors r+ | 
    
  matthiaskrgr 
      added a commit
        to matthiaskrgr/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 22, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Allow any `const` expression blocks in `thread_local!` This PR contains a rebase of the macro change from rust-lang#116392, together with adding a test under library/std/tests. Testing this feature by making the documentation's example code needlessly more complicated was not appropriate as pointed out in rust-lang#116392 (review). Without the macro change, this new test would fail to build as follows: ```console error: no rules expected the token `let` --> library/std/tests/thread.rs:26:13 | 26 | let value = 1; | ^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call | note: while trying to match meta-variable `$init:expr` --> library/std/src/thread/local.rs:189:69 | 189 | ($(#[$attr:meta])* $vis:vis static $name:ident: $t:ty = const { $init:expr }; $($rest:tt)*) => ( | ^^^^^^^^^^ ``` Closes rust-lang#116392.
    
  matthiaskrgr 
      added a commit
        to matthiaskrgr/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 22, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Allow any `const` expression blocks in `thread_local!` This PR contains a rebase of the macro change from rust-lang#116392, together with adding a test under library/std/tests. Testing this feature by making the documentation's example code needlessly more complicated was not appropriate as pointed out in rust-lang#116392 (review). Without the macro change, this new test would fail to build as follows: ```console error: no rules expected the token `let` --> library/std/tests/thread.rs:26:13 | 26 | let value = 1; | ^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call | note: while trying to match meta-variable `$init:expr` --> library/std/src/thread/local.rs:189:69 | 189 | ($(#[$attr:meta])* $vis:vis static $name:ident: $t:ty = const { $init:expr }; $($rest:tt)*) => ( | ^^^^^^^^^^ ``` Closes rust-lang#116392.
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 22, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117910 (Refactor uses of `objc_msgSend` to no longer have clashing definitions) - rust-lang#118639 (Undeprecate lint `unstable_features` and make use of it in the compiler) - rust-lang#119801 (Fix deallocation with wrong allocator in (A)Rc::from_box_in) - rust-lang#120058 (bootstrap: improvements for compiler builds) - rust-lang#120059 (Make generic const type mismatches not hide trait impls from the trait solver) - rust-lang#120097 (Report unreachable subpatterns consistently) - rust-lang#120137 (Validate AggregateKind types in MIR) - rust-lang#120164 (`maybe_lint_impl_trait`: separate `is_downgradable` from `is_object_safe`) - rust-lang#120181 (Allow any `const` expression blocks in `thread_local!`) - rust-lang#120204 (Builtin macros effectively have implicit #[collapse_debuginfo(yes)]) - rust-lang#120218 (rustfmt: Check that a token can begin a nonterminal kind before parsing it as a macro arg) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 22, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117910 (Refactor uses of `objc_msgSend` to no longer have clashing definitions) - rust-lang#118639 (Undeprecate lint `unstable_features` and make use of it in the compiler) - rust-lang#119801 (Fix deallocation with wrong allocator in (A)Rc::from_box_in) - rust-lang#120058 (bootstrap: improvements for compiler builds) - rust-lang#120059 (Make generic const type mismatches not hide trait impls from the trait solver) - rust-lang#120097 (Report unreachable subpatterns consistently) - rust-lang#120137 (Validate AggregateKind types in MIR) - rust-lang#120164 (`maybe_lint_impl_trait`: separate `is_downgradable` from `is_object_safe`) - rust-lang#120181 (Allow any `const` expression blocks in `thread_local!`) - rust-lang#120218 (rustfmt: Check that a token can begin a nonterminal kind before parsing it as a macro arg) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
    
  rust-timer 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 22, 2024 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120181 - dtolnay:tlconst, r=thomcc Allow any `const` expression blocks in `thread_local!` This PR contains a rebase of the macro change from rust-lang#116392, together with adding a test under library/std/tests. Testing this feature by making the documentation's example code needlessly more complicated was not appropriate as pointed out in rust-lang#116392 (review). Without the macro change, this new test would fail to build as follows: ```console error: no rules expected the token `let` --> library/std/tests/thread.rs:26:13 | 26 | let value = 1; | ^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call | note: while trying to match meta-variable `$init:expr` --> library/std/src/thread/local.rs:189:69 | 189 | ($(#[$attr:meta])* $vis:vis static $name:ident: $t:ty = const { $init:expr }; $($rest:tt)*) => ( | ^^^^^^^^^^ ``` Closes rust-lang#116392.
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
This PR contains a rebase of the macro change from #116392, together with adding a test under library/std/tests.
Testing this feature by making the documentation's example code needlessly more complicated was not appropriate as pointed out in #116392 (review).
Without the macro change, this new test would fail to build as follows:
Closes #116392.