-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unify read_to_end and io::copy impls for reading into a Vec #118222
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @m-ou-se (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Nov 24, 2023
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
the8472
force-pushed
the
copy-use-vec-write
branch
from
November 24, 2023 00:12
4fcba27
to
7684bce
Compare
fbstj
reviewed
Nov 24, 2023
the8472
force-pushed
the
copy-use-vec-write
branch
from
November 25, 2023 23:53
7684bce
to
ad3df76
Compare
the8472
force-pushed
the
copy-use-vec-write
branch
from
November 26, 2023 17:13
ad3df76
to
bc7dd5f
Compare
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 28, 2023
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#118193 (Add missing period in `std::process::Command` docs) - rust-lang#118222 (unify read_to_end and io::copy impls for reading into a Vec) - rust-lang#118323 (give dev-friendly error message for incorrect config profiles) - rust-lang#118378 (Perform LTO optimisations with wasm-ld + -Clinker-plugin-lto) - rust-lang#118399 (Clean dead codes in miri) - rust-lang#118410 (update test for new LLVM 18 codegen) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#118193 (Add missing period in `std::process::Command` docs) - rust-lang#118222 (unify read_to_end and io::copy impls for reading into a Vec) - rust-lang#118323 (give dev-friendly error message for incorrect config profiles) - rust-lang#118378 (Perform LTO optimisations with wasm-ld + -Clinker-plugin-lto) - rust-lang#118399 (Clean dead codes in miri) - rust-lang#118410 (update test for new LLVM 18 codegen) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118222 - the8472:copy-use-vec-write, r=m-ou-se unify read_to_end and io::copy impls for reading into a Vec This ports over the initial probe (to avoid allocation) and the dynamic read sizing from the io::copy specialization to the `default_read_to_end` implementation which already had its own optimizations for different cases. I think it should be a best-of-both now. suggested by `@a1phyr` in rust-lang#117576 (comment)
This was referenced Sep 21, 2024
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2024
…ChrisDenton delay uncapping the max_read_size in File::read_to_end In rust-lang#130600 (comment) I realized that we're likely still passing too-large buffers to the OS, at least once at the end. Previous issues and PRs: * rust-lang#110650 * rust-lang#110655 * rust-lang#118222 r? ChrisDenton
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2024
…ChrisDenton delay uncapping the max_read_size in File::read_to_end In rust-lang#130600 (comment) I realized that we're likely still passing too-large buffers to the OS, at least once at the end. Previous issues and PRs: * rust-lang#110650 * rust-lang#110655 * rust-lang#118222 r? ChrisDenton
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2024
…ChrisDenton delay uncapping the max_read_size in File::read_to_end In rust-lang#130600 (comment) I realized that we're likely still passing too-large buffers to the OS, at least once at the end. Previous issues and PRs: * rust-lang#110650 * rust-lang#110655 * rust-lang#118222 r? ChrisDenton
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130670 - the8472:read-to-end-heuristics, r=ChrisDenton delay uncapping the max_read_size in File::read_to_end In rust-lang#130600 (comment) I realized that we're likely still passing too-large buffers to the OS, at least once at the end. Previous issues and PRs: * rust-lang#110650 * rust-lang#110655 * rust-lang#118222 r? ChrisDenton
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This ports over the initial probe (to avoid allocation) and the dynamic read sizing from the io::copy specialization to the
default_read_to_end
implementation which already had its own optimizations for different cases.I think it should be a best-of-both now.
suggested by @a1phyr in #117576 (comment)