ReLateBound -> ReBound
#117876
Merged
ReLateBound -> ReBound
#117876
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
other changes: - `Region::new_late_bound` -> `Region::new_bound` - `Region::is_late_bound` -> `Region::is_bound`
- `RegionVariableOrigin::~~Late~~BoundRegion` - `~~Late~~BoundRegionConversionTime`
- `HAS_RE_LATE_BOUND` -> `HAS_RE_BOUND` - `HAS_TY_LATE_BOUND` -> `HAS_TY_BOUND` - `HAS_CT_LATE_BOUND` -> `HAS_CT_BOUND` - `HAS_LATE_BOUND` -> `HAS_BOUND_VARS` - `fn has_late_bound_regions` -> `fn has_bound_regions` - `fnhas_non_region_late_bound` -> `fn has_non_region_bound_vars` - `fn has_late_bound_vars` -> `fn has_bound_vars`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor This PR changes Stable MIR cc @oli-obk, @celinval, @spastorino, @ouz-a Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=1 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Nov 13, 2023
|
Finished benchmarking commit (4bd2fd5): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 673.14s -> 673.906s (0.11%) |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2023
finish `RegionKind` renaming second step of rust-lang/types-team#95 continues the work from rust-lang#117876. While working on this and I encountered a bunch of further cleanup which I'll either open a tracking issue for or will do in a separate PR: - rewrite the `RegionKind` docs, they still talk about `ReEmpty` and are generally out of date - rename `DescriptionCtx` to `DescriptionCtxt` - what is `CheckRegions::Bound`? - `collect_late_bound_regions` et al - `erase_late_bound_regions` -> `instantiate_bound_regions_with_erased`? - `EraseEarlyRegions` visitor should be removed, feels duplicate r? `@BoxyUwU`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2023
finish `RegionKind` renaming second step of rust-lang/types-team#95 continues the work from rust-lang#117876. While working on this and I encountered a bunch of further cleanup which I'll either open a tracking issue for or will do in a separate PR: - rewrite the `RegionKind` docs, they still talk about `ReEmpty` and are generally out of date - rename `DescriptionCtx` to `DescriptionCtxt` - what is `CheckRegions::Bound`? - `collect_late_bound_regions` et al - `erase_late_bound_regions` -> `instantiate_bound_regions_with_erased`? - `EraseEarlyRegions` visitor should be removed, feels duplicate r? `@BoxyUwU`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2023
finish `RegionKind` renaming second step of rust-lang/types-team#95 continues the work from rust-lang#117876. While working on this and I encountered a bunch of further cleanup which I'll either open a tracking issue for or will do in a separate PR: - rewrite the `RegionKind` docs, they still talk about `ReEmpty` and are generally out of date - rename `DescriptionCtx` to `DescriptionCtxt` - what is `CheckRegions::Bound`? - `collect_late_bound_regions` et al - `erase_late_bound_regions` -> `instantiate_bound_regions_with_erased`? - `EraseEarlyRegions` visitor should be removed, feels duplicate r? `@BoxyUwU`
This was referenced Nov 21, 2023
celinval
added a commit
to model-checking/kani
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2023
We got a bit delayed on the nightly, so this PR closes the gap. The related Rust changes were: - rust-lang/rust#117876 - rust-lang/rust#117688
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
first step of rust-lang/types-team#95
already fairly large xx
there's some future work here I intentionally did not contribute as part of this PR, from my notes:
DescriptionCtxtoDescriptionCtxtCheckRegions::Bound?collect_late_bound_regionset alerase_late_bound_regions->instantiate_bound_regions_with_erased?EraseEarlyRegionsshould be removed, feels duplicater? @BoxyUwU