-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inline and remove create_session
.
#117475
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Currently the parts of session initialization that happen within `rustc_interface` are split between `run_compiler` and `create_session`. This split isn't necessary and obscures what's happening. This commit merges the two functions. I think a single longer function is much clearer than splitting this code across two functions in different modules, especially when `create_session` has 13 parameters, and is misnamed (it also creates the codegen backend). The net result is 43 fewer lines of code.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Nov 1, 2023
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 1, 2023
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2023
…li-obk Inline and remove `create_session`. Currently the parts of session initialization that happen within `rustc_interface` are split between `run_compiler` and `create_session`. This split isn't necessary and obscures what's happening. This commit merges the two functions. I think a single longer function is much clearer than splitting this code across two functions in different modules, especially when `create_session` has 13 parameters, and is misnamed (it also creates the codegen backend). The net result is 43 fewer lines of code. r? `@oli-obk`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#115626 (Clean up unchecked_math, separate out unchecked_shifts) - rust-lang#117029 (Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt inlining tests ) - rust-lang#117397 (Don't emit delayed good-path bugs on panic) - rust-lang#117401 (Refactor: move suggestion functions from demand to suggestions) - rust-lang#117475 (Inline and remove `create_session`.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#115626 (Clean up unchecked_math, separate out unchecked_shifts) - rust-lang#117397 (Don't emit delayed good-path bugs on panic) - rust-lang#117401 (Refactor: move suggestion functions from demand to suggestions) - rust-lang#117475 (Inline and remove `create_session`.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#117475 - nnethercote:rm-create_session, r=oli-obk Inline and remove `create_session`. Currently the parts of session initialization that happen within `rustc_interface` are split between `run_compiler` and `create_session`. This split isn't necessary and obscures what's happening. This commit merges the two functions. I think a single longer function is much clearer than splitting this code across two functions in different modules, especially when `create_session` has 13 parameters, and is misnamed (it also creates the codegen backend). The net result is 43 fewer lines of code. r? ``@oli-obk``
bors-ferrocene bot
added a commit
to ferrocene/ferrocene
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2023
80: Automated pull from upstream `master` r=tshepang a=github-actions[bot] This PR pulls the following changes from the upstream repository: * rust-lang/rust#117498 * rust-lang/rust#117488 * rust-lang/rust#117441 * rust-lang/rust#117373 * rust-lang/rust#117298 * rust-lang/rust#117029 * rust-lang/rust#117289 * rust-lang/rust#117307 * rust-lang/rust#114208 * rust-lang/rust#117482 * rust-lang/rust#117475 * rust-lang/rust#117401 * rust-lang/rust#117397 * rust-lang/rust#115626 * rust-lang/rust#117436 * rust-lang/rust#115356 * rust-lang/rust#117422 * rust-lang/rust#116692 Co-authored-by: David CARLIER <devnexen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Taiki Endo <te316e89@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: ltdk <usr@ltdk.xyz> Co-authored-by: Ryan Mehri <ryan.mehri1@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently the parts of session initialization that happen within
rustc_interface
are split betweenrun_compiler
andcreate_session
. This split isn't necessary and obscures what's happening.This commit merges the two functions. I think a single longer function is much clearer than splitting this code across two functions in different modules, especially when
create_session
has 13 parameters, and is misnamed (it also creates the codegen backend). The net result is 43 fewer lines of code.r? @oli-obk