Skip to content

Conversation

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

@cuviper cuviper commented Jan 18, 2023

As discussed in zulip #t-infra -- r? Mark-Simulacrum

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 18, 2023
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
FROM ubuntu:22.10
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: this is newer because 22.04 (LTS) doesn't have llvm-15. We should probably plan to keep rolling this forward until the next LTS.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2023

📌 Commit 318d77d has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 21, 2023
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup=iffy

compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2023
…acrum

ci: add runners for vanilla LLVM 14 and 15

As discussed in [zulip #t-infra][1] -- r? Mark-Simulacrum

[1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/testing.20multiple.20llvm.20versions
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 23, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 318d77d with merge ad48c10...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 23, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing ad48c10 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 23, 2023
@bors bors merged commit ad48c10 into rust-lang:master Jan 23, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Jan 23, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (ad48c10): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.7% [1.4%, 7.5%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@cuviper cuviper deleted the more-llvm-ci branch March 1, 2023 02:45
cuviper added a commit to cuviper/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2023
Like rust-lang#107044, this will let us track compatibility with LLVM 16 going
forward, especially after we eventually upgrade our own to the next.

This also drops `tidy` here and in `x86_64-gnu-llvm-15`, syncing with
that change in rust-lang#106085.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2023
…lacrum

ci: add a runner for vanilla LLVM 16

Like rust-lang#107044, this will let us track compatibility with LLVM 16 going
forward, especially after we eventually upgrade our own to the next.

This also drops `tidy` here and in `x86_64-gnu-llvm-15`, syncing with
that change in rust-lang#106085.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants