BetaGive feedback
Issues
Search results
proc-macros should not automatically error on token groups that are "locally" syntactically correct
Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#108385 In rust-lang/rust;Modules loaded using
#[path]
are seemingly treated likemod.rs
files even when they're notCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#104705 In rust-lang/rust;Associated functions of generic types are not static
Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the types team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#89667 In rust-lang/rust;Tracking issue: deref patterns
Relating to patterns and pattern matchingRelating to patterns and pattern matchingCategory: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature.Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature.`#![feature(deref_patterns)]``#![feature(deref_patterns)]`Status: There are blocking ❌ design concerns.Status: There are blocking ❌ design concerns.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#87121 In rust-lang/rust;Tracking Issue for RFC 2948: Portable SIMD
Area: SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data)Area: SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data)Area: Enabling/disabling target features like AVX, Neon, etc.Area: Enabling/disabling target features like AVX, Neon, etc.Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature.Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature.Project group: Portable SIMD (https://github.com/rust-lang/project-portable-simd)Project group: Portable SIMD (https://github.com/rust-lang/project-portable-simd)Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#86656 In rust-lang/rust;doc(alias)
: should it be a mapping rather than search terms?Area: `#[doc(alias)]`Area: `#[doc(alias)]`Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#82000 In rust-lang/rust;Stabilize
#![feature(staged_api)]
Area: Rustdoc UI (generated HTML)Area: Rustdoc UI (generated HTML)Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#79663 In rust-lang/rust;Tracking Issue for
const_heap
Area: Custom and system allocatorsArea: Custom and system allocatorsArea: Constant evaluation (MIR interpretation)Area: Constant evaluation (MIR interpretation)Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature.Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature.`#[feature(const_heap)]``#[feature(const_heap)]`Libs issues that are tracked on the team's project board.Libs issues that are tracked on the team's project board.Status: The implementation is incomplete.Status: The implementation is incomplete.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#79597 In rust-lang/rust;Interactions in
type_alias_impl_trait
andassociated_type_defaults
Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.`#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]``#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]``#[feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]``#[feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]`Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way.Status: Open.#71083 In rust-lang/rust;Support index size != pointer width
Area: The type systemArea: The type systemCategory: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#65473 In rust-lang/rust;Const validation rejects references that might be dangling (but could actually be valid at run-time)
Area: Constant evaluation (MIR interpretation)Area: Constant evaluation (MIR interpretation)Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way.This issue requires a nightly compiler in some way.Status: Open.#63197 In rust-lang/rust;allow(deprecated) is too coarse-grained, should take a path
Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`)Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`)Area: Compiler frontend (errors, parsing and HIR)Area: Compiler frontend (errors, parsing and HIR)Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.This change is large or controversial enough that it should have an RFC accepted before doing it.Status: Open.#62398 In rust-lang/rust;