Skip to content

Using ManuallyDrop causes allocas and memcpys that LLVM cannot remove #79914

Open
@scottmcm

Description

@scottmcm

It's great that ManuallyDrop helps people do the right thing by pre-leaking things they plan to move elsewhere, helping to avoid double-free issues.

But unfortunately ManuallyDrop::new gets codegened as copying the whole thing into a local variable, and LLVM frequently cannot remove it. This is particularly frustrating for large types where the ABI passes them by pointer, as they get copied from that pointer to the stack (which, in addition to the copy, means more stack manipulation and __rust_probestack call than necessary). Demo: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/Y8o7MG

#![feature(maybe_uninit_extra)]
#![feature(min_const_generics)]
use std::mem::{ManuallyDrop, MaybeUninit};
fn array_map<T, U, const N: usize>(a: [T; N], f: impl Fn(T) -> U) -> [U;N]
{
    // For this demo, always just leak on panic.
    // Obviously a full implementation should do more,
    // but this is sufficient to show the problem.
    let a = ManuallyDrop::new(a);
    union Foo<V, const M: usize> {
        uninit: (),
        partial: ManuallyDrop<[MaybeUninit<V>; M]>,
        done: ManuallyDrop<[V; M]>,
    }
    let mut result = Foo::<U, N> { uninit: () };
    unsafe {
        for i in 0..N {
            (*result.partial)[i].write(f(std::ptr::read(&a[i])));
        }
        ManuallyDrop::into_inner(result.done)
    }
}

pub fn demo(a: [u32; 400]) -> [i64; 400] {
    array_map(a, From::from)
}

Note in particular the following (generated with nightly 2020-12-07 in the godbolt link):

define void @_ZN7example4demo17hf199b6e7768bfe59E([400 x i64]* noalias nocapture sret dereferenceable(3200) %0, [400 x i32]* noalias nocapture readonly dereferenceable(1600) %a) unnamed_addr #0 personality i32 (i32, i32, i64, %"unwind::libunwind::_Unwind_Exception"*, %"unwind::libunwind::_Unwind_Context"*)* @rust_eh_personality !dbg !6 {
start:
  %result.i = alloca %"array_map::Foo<i64, 400_usize>", align 8
  %a1.i = alloca %"std::mem::ManuallyDrop<[u32; 400]>", align 4

There's no good reason for either of those locals, and this is comparatively easy mode -- panic=abort and the monomorphization is only using Copy types that definitely don't need dropping.

At the ABI level this is fn demo(*mut [i64; 400], *const [u32; 400]), so there ought to be a way to write this function in Rust such that it would produce the obvious no-stack-needed implementation of out[i] = static_cast<_>(in[i]);. But I can't find one.

Undeveloped musings on possible fixes:

  • Don't lower ManuallyDrop as its own type in codegen (it's already a lang item anyway)
  • Write a mir-opt to make the wrapper disappear (since it's transparent anyway and in MIR drops are explicit so the type difference is unimportant)
  • Create some sort of forget-in-place intrinsic that just suppresses the drop without moving anything or invalidating the binding
  • Figure out why LLVM can't optimize this away and fix that
  • ...

Edit: FWIW, -Z mir-opt-level=3 -Z unsound-mir-opts=yes doesn't fix this either (as of 2020-12-12)


I started looking into this as part of figuring out what was happening in #75571

Finally decided to open this after this CI failure (which I'd made sure worked locally), https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/runs/1532668348

/checkout/src/test/codegen/vec-extend_from_array.rs:12:16: error: CHECK-NOT: excluded string found in input
 // CHECK-NOT: alloca
               ^
/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/codegen/vec-extend_from_array/vec-extend_from_array.ll:128:14: note: found here
 %array1.i = alloca %"std::mem::ManuallyDrop<[std::string::String; 400]>", align 8
             ^~~~~~

MaybeUninit has similar issues, but that might be covered by #61011

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    A-LLVMArea: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.C-bugCategory: This is a bug.I-slowIssue: Problems and improvements with respect to performance of generated code.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions