-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
the recursive limit doesn't work with println! and other macros #41731
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-macrosArea: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.I-crashIssue: The compiler crashes (SIGSEGV, SIGABRT, etc). Use I-ICE instead when the compiler panics.Issue: The compiler crashes (SIGSEGV, SIGABRT, etc). Use I-ICE instead when the compiler panics.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-macrosArea: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.I-crashIssue: The compiler crashes (SIGSEGV, SIGABRT, etc). Use I-ICE instead when the compiler panics.Issue: The compiler crashes (SIGSEGV, SIGABRT, etc). Use I-ICE instead when the compiler panics.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
This code makes the compiler crash with a stack overflow (tested on the playground):
You can try this code on the playground.
If you replace the
println!by aprint!, the compiler will crash with a segmentation fault instead.You can try this on the playground too.
The compiler doesn't detect the recursive macro. In fact, it only detect them if we remove the
println!.