Skip to content

fallout from Sound Generic Drop to be addressed later #22321

Closed
@pnkfelix

Description

@pnkfelix

This is meant as a meta-bug for me to collect references to places where users complained about fallout from Sound Generic Drop (#21972) and its precursors (namely #21657 in particular).

It might be a places to pose ideas for ways to address complaints, but keeping in mind the distinction between language features versus tooling, I would prefer for the comments on this ticket to focus on things we can do without changing the language per se, and try to put language changes somewhere on the RFC repo. For example, ways to encode "this destructor for this type is pure" is an example of such a language feature.

(I do not know where something like "borrow scopes should not always be lexical" (#6393) falls in that categorization; that might be an example of something that would not require an RFC, but maybe it does at this point.)


Potential work items:


key terms: destruction scope, block suffix, unsafe_destructor

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

A-destructorsArea: Destructors (`Drop`, …)C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCmetabugIssues about issues themselves ("bugs about bugs")

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions