Skip to content

Tracking Issue for rustdoc --doctest-compilation-args command line option #134172

Open
@GuillaumeGomez

Description

Steps

Original issue

Unresolved Questions

  • Should argument parsing be closer to what already exists for RUSTFLAGS (whitespace splitting and nothing else) or should it be closer to how shell parses input (take into account escaped characters and quote characters)? Or should we offer two options, one that works like RUSTFLAGS for human users and one that works like CARGO_ENCODED_RUSTLFAGS for tool usage?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCT-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions