Tracking Issue for pattern types

[oli-obk]

This is a tracking issue for the feature gate #![feature(pattern_types).

About tracking issues

Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.

Steps

• Implementation (Implement minimal, internal-only pattern types in the type system #120131)
• non-macro syntax impl & rustfmt impl
• Adjust documentation (see instructions on rustc-dev-guide)
• Formatting for new syntax has been added to the Style Guide (nightly-style-procedure)
• Stabilization PR (see instructions on rustc-dev-guide)

Unresolved Questions

• Pattern type ranges cause monomorphization time errors on wraparound ranges (u8 is 10..5)
  • Same problems as having N + 2 in an array length for u8 is N..5 or even u8 is A..B
• should we forbid full-range patterns like u8 is 0..?
• are pattern types always ABI compatible with their base type?

Implementation history

• Implement minimal, internal-only pattern types in the type system #120131
• Pattern types: Avoid having to handle an Option for range ends in the type system or the HIR #136922
• Allow int literals for pattern types with int base types #137715

[oli-obk]

Tracking issues have a tendency to become unmanageable. Please open a dedicated new issue and label it with F-pattern_types for absolutely any topics you want to discuss or have questions about. See rust-lang/compiler-team#739 for details and discussions on this prospective policy.