Closed
Description
openedon Mar 25, 2024
There is some discussion on #114447 (comment) about whether or not static_mut_refs
should be triggering on code that takes references without using the &
sigil, such as method calls.
This should probably be resolved soon if this is to be part of the edition. If this needs to change after the edition, the implementation will likely require separate code paths for the lint versus edition behavior, which could become confusing, or risk unintentional breakage.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment