From f3ae96ecd54b244857ce565c373a3363009e68f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 20:10:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Clean up E0769 explanation

---
 .../src/error_codes/E0769.md                  | 22 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0769.md b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0769.md
index d1995be9899b1..4a3b674b05896 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0769.md
+++ b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0769.md
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-A tuple struct or tuple variant was used in a pattern as if it were a
-struct or struct variant.
+A tuple struct or tuple variant was used in a pattern as if it were a struct or
+struct variant.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ Erroneous code example:
 enum E {
     A(i32),
 }
+
 let e = E::A(42);
+
 match e {
-    E::A { number } => println!("{}", x),
+    E::A { number } => { // error!
+        println!("{}", number);
+    }
 }
 ```
 
@@ -21,12 +25,14 @@ To fix this error, you can use the tuple pattern:
 # }
 # let e = E::A(42);
 match e {
-    E::A(number) => println!("{}", number),
+    E::A(number) => { // ok!
+        println!("{}", number);
+    }
 }
 ```
 
-Alternatively, you can also use the struct pattern by using the correct
-field names and binding them to new identifiers:
+Alternatively, you can also use the struct pattern by using the correct field
+names and binding them to new identifiers:
 
 ```
 # enum E {
@@ -34,6 +40,8 @@ field names and binding them to new identifiers:
 # }
 # let e = E::A(42);
 match e {
-    E::A { 0: number } => println!("{}", number),
+    E::A { 0: number } => { // ok!
+        println!("{}", number);
+    }
 }
 ```