Adjust doc comment of Condvar::wait_while

The existing phrasing implies that a notification must be received for `wait_while` to return. The phrasing is changed to make no such implication.

Author: rawler

library/std/src/sync/condvar.rs

@@ -195,8 +195,10 @@ impl Condvar {
         if poisoned { Err(PoisonError::new(guard)) } else { Ok(guard) }
     }
 
-    /// Blocks the current thread until this condition variable receives a
-    /// notification and the provided condition is false.
+    /// Blocks the current thread until the provided `condition` is met.
+    ///
+    /// While `condition` is not met, this function will [`wait`] for
+    /// notification, before again checking `condition`.
     ///
     /// This function will atomically unlock the mutex specified (represented by
     /// `guard`) and block the current thread. This means that any calls
@@ -210,6 +212,7 @@ impl Condvar {
     /// poisoned when this thread re-acquires the lock. For more information,
     /// see information about [poisoning] on the [`Mutex`] type.
     ///
+    /// [`wait`]: Self::wait
     /// [`notify_one`]: Self::notify_one
     /// [`notify_all`]: Self::notify_all
     /// [poisoning]: super::Mutex#poisoning