|
| 1 | +//@ run-pass |
| 2 | +//! Test drop order for different ways of declaring pattern bindings involving or-patterns. |
| 3 | +//! Currently, it's inconsistent between language constructs (#142163). |
| 4 | +
|
| 5 | +use std::cell::RefCell; |
| 6 | +use std::ops::Drop; |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +// For more informative failures, we collect drops in a `Vec` before checking their order. |
| 9 | +struct DropOrder(RefCell<Vec<u32>>); |
| 10 | +struct LogDrop<'o>(&'o DropOrder, u32); |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +impl<'o> Drop for LogDrop<'o> { |
| 13 | + fn drop(&mut self) { |
| 14 | + self.0.0.borrow_mut().push(self.1); |
| 15 | + } |
| 16 | +} |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +#[track_caller] |
| 19 | +fn assert_drop_order(expected_drops: impl IntoIterator<Item = u32>, f: impl Fn(&DropOrder)) { |
| 20 | + let order = DropOrder(RefCell::new(Vec::new())); |
| 21 | + f(&order); |
| 22 | + let order = order.0.into_inner(); |
| 23 | + let correct_order: Vec<u32> = expected_drops.into_iter().collect(); |
| 24 | + assert_eq!(order, correct_order); |
| 25 | +} |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +#[expect(unused_variables, unused_assignments, irrefutable_let_patterns)] |
| 28 | +fn main() { |
| 29 | + // When bindings are declared with `let pat;`, they're visited in left-to-right order, using the |
| 30 | + // order given by the first occurrence of each variable. They're later dropped in reverse. |
| 31 | + assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| 32 | + // Drops are right-to-left: `z`, `y`, `x`. |
| 33 | + let (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z); |
| 34 | + // Assignment order doesn't matter. |
| 35 | + z = LogDrop(o, 1); |
| 36 | + y = LogDrop(o, 2); |
| 37 | + x = LogDrop(o, 3); |
| 38 | + }); |
| 39 | + assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| 40 | + // The first or-pattern alternative determines the bindings' drop order: `y`, `x`. |
| 41 | + let ((true, x, y) | (false, y, x)); |
| 42 | + x = LogDrop(o, 2); |
| 43 | + y = LogDrop(o, 1); |
| 44 | + }); |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | + // When bindings are declared with `let pat = expr;`, bindings within or-patterns are seen last, |
| 47 | + // thus they're dropped first. |
| 48 | + assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| 49 | + // Drops are right-to-left, treating `y` as rightmost: `y`, `z`, `x`. |
| 50 | + let (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z) = (LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 1)), LogDrop(o, 2)); |
| 51 | + }); |
| 52 | + assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| 53 | + // The first or-pattern alternative determines the bindings' drop order: `y`, `x`. |
| 54 | + let ((true, x, y) | (false, y, x)) = (true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1)); |
| 55 | + }); |
| 56 | + assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| 57 | + // That drop order is used regardless of which or-pattern alternative matches: `y`, `x`. |
| 58 | + let ((true, x, y) | (false, y, x)) = (false, LogDrop(o, 1), LogDrop(o, 2)); |
| 59 | + }); |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | + // `match` treats or-patterns as last like `let pat = expr;`, but also determines drop order |
| 62 | + // using the order of the bindings in the *last* or-pattern alternative. |
| 63 | + assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| 64 | + // Drops are right-to-left, treating `y` as rightmost: `y`, `z`, `x`. |
| 65 | + match (LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 1)), LogDrop(o, 2)) { (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z) => {} } |
| 66 | + }); |
| 67 | + assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| 68 | + // The last or-pattern alternative determines the bindings' drop order: `x`, `y`. |
| 69 | + match (true, LogDrop(o, 1), LogDrop(o, 2)) { (true, x, y) | (false, y, x) => {} } |
| 70 | + }); |
| 71 | + assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| 72 | + // That drop order is used regardless of which or-pattern alternative matches: `x`, `y`. |
| 73 | + match (false, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1)) { (true, x, y) | (false, y, x) => {} } |
| 74 | + }); |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + // Function params are visited one-by-one, and the order of bindings within a param's pattern is |
| 77 | + // the same as `let pat = expr`; |
| 78 | + assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| 79 | + // Among separate params, the drop order is right-to-left: `z`, `y`, `x`. |
| 80 | + (|x, (Ok(y) | Err(y)), z| {})(LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 2)), LogDrop(o, 1)); |
| 81 | + }); |
| 82 | + assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| 83 | + // Within a param's pattern, or-patterns are treated as rightmost: `y`, `z`, `x`. |
| 84 | + (|(x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z)| {})((LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 1)), LogDrop(o, 2))); |
| 85 | + }); |
| 86 | + assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| 87 | + // The first or-pattern alternative determines the bindings' drop order: `y`, `x`. |
| 88 | + (|((true, x, y) | (false, y, x))| {})((true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1))); |
| 89 | + }); |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | + // `if let` and `let`-`else` see bindings in the same order as `let pat = expr;`. |
| 92 | + // Vars in or-patterns are seen last (dropped first), and the first alternative's order is used. |
| 93 | + assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| 94 | + if let (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z) = (LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 1)), LogDrop(o, 2)) {} |
| 95 | + }); |
| 96 | + assert_drop_order(1..=3, |o| { |
| 97 | + let (x, Ok(y) | Err(y), z) = (LogDrop(o, 3), Ok(LogDrop(o, 1)), LogDrop(o, 2)) else { |
| 98 | + unreachable!(); |
| 99 | + }; |
| 100 | + }); |
| 101 | + assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| 102 | + if let (true, x, y) | (false, y, x) = (true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1)) {} |
| 103 | + }); |
| 104 | + assert_drop_order(1..=2, |o| { |
| 105 | + let ((true, x, y) | (false, y, x)) = (true, LogDrop(o, 2), LogDrop(o, 1)) else { |
| 106 | + unreachable!(); |
| 107 | + }; |
| 108 | + }); |
| 109 | +} |
0 commit comments