Rollup merge of #87644 - Flying-Toast:vec-remove-note, r=the8472

Recommend `swap_remove` in `Vec::remove` docs

I was able to increase the performance (by 20%!) of my project by changing a `Vec::remove` call to `Vec::swap_remove` in a hot function. I think we should explicitly put a note in the Vec::remove docs to guide people in the right direction so they don't make a similar oversight.

library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs

@@ -1360,6 +1360,12 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> Vec<T, A> {
     /// Removes and returns the element at position `index` within the vector,
     /// shifting all elements after it to the left.
     ///
+    /// Note: Because this shifts over the remaining elements, it has a
+    /// worst-case performance of O(n). If you don't need the order of elements
+    /// to be preserved, use [`swap_remove`] instead.
+    ///
+    /// [`swap_remove`]: Vec::swap_remove
+    ///
     /// # Panics
     ///
     /// Panics if `index` is out of bounds.