From 0c8bdd0bf33c2313ad9d0be495ffde8f4532237a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gurinder Singh Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:03:40 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Fail typeck for illegal break-with-value This is fixes the issue wherein typeck was succeeding for break-with-value at illegal locations such as inside `while`, `while let` and `for` loops which eventually caused an ICE during MIR interpetation for const eval. Now we fail typeck for such code which prevents faulty MIR from being generated and interpreted, thus fixing the ICE. --- compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs | 13 ++++++--- .../issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.rs | 20 +++++++++++++ ...sue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.stderr | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tests/ui/typeck/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.rs create mode 100644 tests/ui/typeck/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.stderr diff --git a/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs b/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs index be225ceb84321..b1d6e4f0523b6 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs @@ -625,10 +625,15 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { } }; - // If the loop context is not a `loop { }`, then break with - // a value is illegal, and `opt_coerce_to` will be `None`. - // Just set expectation to error in that case. - let coerce_to = opt_coerce_to.unwrap_or_else(|| Ty::new_misc_error(tcx)); + let coerce_to = match opt_coerce_to { + Some(c) => c, + None => { + // If the loop context is not a `loop { }`, then break with + // a value is illegal, and `opt_coerce_to` will be `None`. + // Return error in that case (#114529). + return Ty::new_misc_error(tcx); + } + }; // Recurse without `enclosing_breakables` borrowed. e_ty = self.check_expr_with_hint(e, coerce_to); diff --git a/tests/ui/typeck/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.rs b/tests/ui/typeck/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.rs new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..613d1b6343a34 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/typeck/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.rs @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +// Regression test for issue #114529 +// Tests that we do not ICE during const eval for a +// break-with-value in contexts where it is illegal + +#[allow(while_true)] +fn main() { + [(); { + while true { + break 9; //~ ERROR `break` with value from a `while` loop + }; + 51 + }]; + + [(); { + while let Some(v) = Some(9) { + break v; //~ ERROR `break` with value from a `while` loop + }; + 51 + }]; +} diff --git a/tests/ui/typeck/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.stderr b/tests/ui/typeck/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.stderr new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..4d6c27bbbd03b --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/typeck/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +error[E0571]: `break` with value from a `while` loop + --> $DIR/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.rs:9:13 + | +LL | while true { + | ---------- you can't `break` with a value in a `while` loop +LL | break 9; + | ^^^^^^^ can only break with a value inside `loop` or breakable block + | +help: use `break` on its own without a value inside this `while` loop + | +LL | break; + | ~~~~~ + +error[E0571]: `break` with value from a `while` loop + --> $DIR/issue-114529-illegal-break-with-value.rs:16:13 + | +LL | while let Some(v) = Some(9) { + | --------------------------- you can't `break` with a value in a `while` loop +LL | break v; + | ^^^^^^^ can only break with a value inside `loop` or breakable block + | +help: use `break` on its own without a value inside this `while` loop + | +LL | break; + | ~~~~~ + +error: aborting due to 2 previous errors + +For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0571`.