Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Invalid placeholder relation constraints are redirects
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
This commit makes the search for blamable outlives constraints
treat an added `x: 'static` edge as a redirect to figure out
why it reached an invalid placeholder.

As a drive-by it also refactors the blame search somewhat, renames
a few methods, and allows iterating over outgoing constraints
without the implied edges from 'static.
  • Loading branch information
amandasystems committed Sep 12, 2024
1 parent 4214d06 commit 07b10ca
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 110 additions and 60 deletions.
20 changes: 15 additions & 5 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/graph.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -106,15 +106,17 @@ impl<D: ConstraintGraphDirection> ConstraintGraph<D> {
}

/// Given a region `R`, iterate over all constraints `R: R1`.
/// if `static_region` is `None`, do not yield implicit
/// `'static -> a` edges.
pub(crate) fn outgoing_edges<'a, 'tcx>(
&'a self,
region_sup: RegionVid,
constraints: &'a OutlivesConstraintSet<'tcx>,
static_region: RegionVid,
static_region: Option<RegionVid>,
) -> Edges<'a, 'tcx, D> {
//if this is the `'static` region and the graph's direction is normal,
//then setup the Edges iterator to return all regions #53178
if region_sup == static_region && D::is_normal() {
if Some(region_sup) == static_region && D::is_normal() {
Edges {
graph: self,
constraints,
Expand All @@ -135,7 +137,7 @@ pub(crate) struct Edges<'s, 'tcx, D: ConstraintGraphDirection> {
constraints: &'s OutlivesConstraintSet<'tcx>,
pointer: Option<OutlivesConstraintIndex>,
next_static_idx: Option<usize>,
static_region: RegionVid,
static_region: Option<RegionVid>,
}

impl<'s, 'tcx, D: ConstraintGraphDirection> Iterator for Edges<'s, 'tcx, D> {
Expand All @@ -153,8 +155,12 @@ impl<'s, 'tcx, D: ConstraintGraphDirection> Iterator for Edges<'s, 'tcx, D> {
Some(next_static_idx + 1)
};

let Some(static_region) = self.static_region else {
return None;
};

Some(OutlivesConstraint {
sup: self.static_region,
sup: static_region,
sub: next_static_idx.into(),
locations: Locations::All(DUMMY_SP),
span: DUMMY_SP,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -194,7 +200,11 @@ impl<'s, 'tcx, D: ConstraintGraphDirection> RegionGraph<'s, 'tcx, D> {
/// there exists a constraint `R: R1`.
pub(crate) fn outgoing_regions(&self, region_sup: RegionVid) -> Successors<'s, 'tcx, D> {
Successors {
edges: self.constraint_graph.outgoing_edges(region_sup, self.set, self.static_region),
edges: self.constraint_graph.outgoing_edges(
region_sup,
self.set,
Some(self.static_region),
),
}
}
}
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/constraints/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ impl<'tcx> OutlivesConstraintSet<'tcx> {
// reaches another placeholder, add a requirement that it must
// outlive `'static`.
if let Some(offending_region) = annotation.placeholder_violation(&sccs) {
assert!(
annotation.representative != offending_region,
"Attemtping to blame a constraint for itself!"
);
// Optimisation opportunity: this will add more constraints than
// needed for correctness, since an SCC upstream of another with
// a universe violation will "infect" its downstream SCCs to also
Expand Down
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/graphviz.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::UniverseIndex;
use super::*;

fn render_outlives_constraint(constraint: &OutlivesConstraint<'_>) -> String {
if let ConstraintCategory::IllegalPlaceholder(p) = constraint.category {
return format!("b/c {p:?}");
}
match constraint.locations {
Locations::All(_) => "All(...)".to_string(),
Locations::Single(loc) => format!("{loc:?}"),
Expand Down
143 changes: 88 additions & 55 deletions compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1777,18 +1777,20 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
}

/// Walks the graph of constraints (where `'a: 'b` is considered
/// an edge `'a -> 'b`) to find all paths from `from_region` to
/// `to_region`. The paths are accumulated into the vector
/// `results`. The paths are stored as a series of
/// `ConstraintIndex` values -- in other words, a list of *edges*.
///
/// an edge `'a -> 'b`) to find a path from `from_region` to
/// the first region `R` for which the predicate function
/// `target_test` returns `true`.
/// Returns: a series of constraints as well as the region `R`
/// that passed the target test.
/// If `include_static_outlives_all` is `true`, then the synthetic
/// outlives constraints `'static -> a` for every region `a` are
/// considered in the search, otherwise they are ignored.
#[instrument(skip(self, target_test), ret)]
pub(crate) fn find_constraint_paths_between_regions(
pub(crate) fn find_constraint_path_to(
&self,
from_region: RegionVid,
target_test: impl Fn(RegionVid) -> bool,
include_static_outlives_all: bool,
) -> Option<(Vec<OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>, RegionVid)> {
let mut context = IndexVec::from_elem(Trace::NotVisited, &self.definitions);
context[from_region] = Trace::StartRegion;
Expand All @@ -1801,7 +1803,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {

while let Some(r) = deque.pop_front() {
debug!(
"find_constraint_paths_between_regions: from_region={:?} r={:?} value={}",
"find_constraint_path_to: from_region={:?} r={:?} value={}",
from_region,
r,
self.region_value_str(r),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1837,7 +1839,11 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {

// A constraint like `'r: 'x` can come from our constraint
// graph.
let fr_static = self.universal_regions.fr_static;
let fr_static = if include_static_outlives_all {
Some(self.universal_regions.fr_static)
} else {
None
};
let outgoing_edges_from_graph =
self.constraint_graph.outgoing_edges(r, &self.constraints, fr_static);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1883,11 +1889,13 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
pub(crate) fn find_sub_region_live_at(&self, fr1: RegionVid, location: Location) -> RegionVid {
trace!(scc = ?self.constraint_sccs.scc(fr1));
trace!(universe = ?self.region_universe(fr1));
self.find_constraint_paths_between_regions(fr1, |r| {
self.find_constraint_path_to(fr1, |r| {
// First look for some `r` such that `fr1: r` and `r` is live at `location`
trace!(?r, liveness_constraints=?self.liveness_constraints.pretty_print_live_points(r));
self.liveness_constraints.is_live_at(r, location)
})
},
true
)
.map(|(_path, r)| r)
.unwrap()
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1919,6 +1927,67 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
self.universal_regions.as_ref()
}

/// Find a path of outlives constraints from `from` to `to`,
/// taking placeholder blame constraints into account, e.g.
/// if there is a relationship where `r1` reaches `r2` and
/// r2 has a larger universe or if r1 and r2 both come from
/// placeholder regions.
///
/// Returns the path and the target region, which may or may
/// not be the original `to`. It panics if there is no such
/// path.
fn path_to_modulo_placeholders(
&self,
from: RegionVid,
to: RegionVid,
) -> (Vec<OutlivesConstraint<'tcx>>, RegionVid) {
let path =
self.find_constraint_path_to(from, |r| r == to, true).unwrap().0;

// If we are looking for a path to 'static, and we are passing
// through a constraint synthesised from an illegal placeholder
// relation, redirect the search to the placeholder to blame.
if self.is_static(to) {
for constraint in path.iter() {
let ConstraintCategory::IllegalPlaceholder(culprit_r) = constraint.category else {
continue;
};

debug!("{culprit_r:?} is the reason {from:?}: 'static!");
// FIXME: think: this may be for transitive reasons and
// we may have to do this arbitrarily many times. Or may we?
return self.find_constraint_path_to(from, |r| r == culprit_r, false).unwrap();
}
}
// No funny business; just return the path!
(path, to)
}

/// Find interesting spans from bound placeholders' predicates
/// from a constraint path.
fn find_bound_region_predicate_span(
&self,
path: &[OutlivesConstraint<'_>],
) -> Vec<ExtraConstraintInfo> {
for constraint in path.iter() {
let outlived = constraint.sub;
let Some(origin) = self.var_infos.get(outlived) else {
continue;
};
let RegionVariableOrigin::Nll(NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(p)) = origin.origin
else {
continue;
};
debug!(?constraint, ?p);
let ConstraintCategory::Predicate(span) = constraint.category else {
continue;
};
// We only want to point to one
return vec![ExtraConstraintInfo::PlaceholderFromPredicate(span)];
}
vec![]
}

/// Tries to find the best constraint to blame for the fact that
/// `to_region: from_region`.
/// This works by following the constraint graph,
Expand All @@ -1932,34 +2001,10 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
from_region_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin,
to_region: RegionVid,
) -> (BlameConstraint<'tcx>, Vec<ExtraConstraintInfo>) {
let result = self.best_blame_constraint_(from_region, from_region_origin, to_region);

// We are trying to blame an outlives-static constraint added
// by an issue with placeholder regions. We figure out why the placeholder
// region issue happened instead.
if let ConstraintCategory::IllegalPlaceholder(offending_r) = result.0.category {
debug!("best_blame_constraint: placeholder issue caused by {offending_r:?}");

if to_region == offending_r {
// We do not want an infinite loop.
return result;
}
return self.best_blame_constraint(from_region, from_region_origin, offending_r);
}
assert!(from_region != to_region, "Trying to blame a region for itself!");

result
}
let (path, new_to_region) = self.path_to_modulo_placeholders(from_region, to_region);

#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
pub(crate) fn best_blame_constraint_(
&self,
from_region: RegionVid,
from_region_origin: NllRegionVariableOrigin,
to_region: RegionVid,
) -> (BlameConstraint<'tcx>, Vec<ExtraConstraintInfo>) {
// Find all paths
let (path, target_region) =
self.find_constraint_paths_between_regions(from_region, |r| r == to_region).unwrap();
debug!(
"path={:#?}",
path.iter()
Expand All @@ -1972,24 +2017,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
);

let mut extra_info = vec![];
for constraint in path.iter() {
let outlived = constraint.sub;
let Some(origin) = self.var_infos.get(outlived) else {
continue;
};
let RegionVariableOrigin::Nll(NllRegionVariableOrigin::Placeholder(p)) = origin.origin
else {
continue;
};
debug!(?constraint, ?p);
let ConstraintCategory::Predicate(span) = constraint.category else {
continue;
};
extra_info.push(ExtraConstraintInfo::PlaceholderFromPredicate(span));
// We only want to point to one
break;
}
let extra_info = self.find_bound_region_predicate_span(&path);

// We try to avoid reporting a `ConstraintCategory::Predicate` as our best constraint.
// Instead, we use it to produce an improved `ObligationCauseCode`.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2040,7 +2068,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
// most likely to be the point where the value escapes -- but
// we still want to screen for an "interesting" point to
// highlight (e.g., a call site or something).
let target_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(target_region);
let target_scc = self.constraint_sccs.scc(new_to_region);
let mut range = 0..path.len();

// As noted above, when reporting an error, there is typically a chain of constraints
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2237,6 +2265,11 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
fn scc_representative(&self, scc: ConstraintSccIndex) -> RegionVid {
self.constraint_sccs.annotation(scc).representative
}

/// Returns true if `r` is `'static`.
fn is_static(&self, r: RegionVid) -> bool {
r == self.universal_regions.fr_static
}
}

impl<'tcx> RegionDefinition<'tcx> {
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 07b10ca

Please sign in to comment.