Rustup to 2016-03-11

[mcarton]

Ref rust-lang/rust#31710.
For tomorrow’s nightly, don’t bother building it today Travis.

[llogiq]

Travis did bother anyway 😃

[Manishearth]

New failures:

   Compiling semver v0.2.3

   Compiling clippy v0.0.49 (file:///home/travis/build/Manishearth/rust-clippy)

src/cyclomatic_complexity.rs:128:21: 128:32 error: unresolved enum variant, struct or const `TyFnDef` [E0419]

src/cyclomatic_complexity.rs:128                     ty::TyFnDef(_, _, ty) | ty::TyFnPtr(ty) if ty.sig.skip_binder().output.diverges() => {

                                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~

src/cyclomatic_complexity.rs:128:21: 128:32 help: run `rustc --explain E0419` to see a detailed explanation

src/cyclomatic_complexity.rs:128:45: 128:56 error: unresolved enum variant, struct or const `TyFnPtr` [E0419]

src/cyclomatic_complexity.rs:128                     ty::TyFnDef(_, _, ty) | ty::TyFnPtr(ty) if ty.sig.skip_binder().output.diverges() => {

                                                                             ^~~~~~~~~~~

src/cyclomatic_complexity.rs:128:45: 128:56 help: run `rustc --explain E0419` to see a detailed explanation

src/eta_reduction.rs:63:21: 63:32 error: unresolved enum variant, struct or const `TyFnDef` [E0419]

src/eta_reduction.rs:63                     ty::TyFnDef(_, _, fn_ty) | ty::TyFnPtr(fn_ty) => {

                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~

src/eta_reduction.rs:63:21: 63:32 help: run `rustc --explain E0419` to see a detailed explanation

src/eta_reduction.rs:63:48: 63:59 error: unresolved enum variant, struct or const `TyFnPtr` [E0419]

src/eta_reduction.rs:63                     ty::TyFnDef(_, _, fn_ty) | ty::TyFnPtr(fn_ty) => {

                                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~

src/eta_reduction.rs:63:48: 63:59 help: run `rustc --explain E0419` to see a detailed explanation

src/derive.rs:158:29: 158:54 error: no associated item named `TyFnPtr` found for type `rustc::middle::ty::sty::TypeVariants<'_>` in the current scope

src/derive.rs:158                             TypeVariants::TyFnPtr(..) => {

                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

src/mut_reference.rs:57:9: 57:49 error: no associated item named `TyFnDef` found for type `rustc::middle::ty::sty::TypeVariants<'_>` in the current scope

src/mut_reference.rs:57         TypeVariants::TyFnDef(_, _, ref fn_type) | TypeVariants::TyFnPtr(ref fn_type) => {

                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

src/mut_reference.rs:57:52: 57:86 error: no associated item named `TyFnPtr` found for type `rustc::middle::ty::sty::TypeVariants<'_>` in the current scope

src/mut_reference.rs:57         TypeVariants::TyFnDef(_, _, ref fn_type) | TypeVariants::TyFnPtr(ref fn_type) => {

                                                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

src/mut_reference.rs:58:31: 58:42 error: the type of this value must be known in this context

src/mut_reference.rs:58             let parameters = &fn_type.sig.skip_binder().inputs;

                                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~

src/mut_reference.rs:59:63: 59:80 error: the type of this value must be known in this context

src/mut_reference.rs:59             for (argument, parameter) in arguments.iter().zip(parameters.iter()) {

                                                                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

src/mut_reference.rs:60:23: 60:36 error: the type of this value must be known in this context

src/mut_reference.rs:60                 match parameter.sty {

                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

src/mut_reference.rs:63:60: 63:73 error: the type of this value must be known in this context

src/mut_reference.rs:63                         if let ExprAddrOf(MutMutable, _) = argument.node {

[mcarton]

@Manishearth patience, the right nightly hasn’t been release yet, 😛
Travis has

$ rustc --version
rustc 1.9.0-nightly (cc62db802 2016-03-09)

rust-lang/rust#31710 was merged yesterday (2016-03-10) at 7:41 AM GTM+1.

[eddyb]

Why is this code using TypeVariants directly?

[mcarton]

No idea, I was like that. I don’t dislike it. I left it.

[eddyb]

Right, but, it should be using ty.