Skip to content

Extend cargo dev rename_lint #14633

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 16, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

@Jarcho Jarcho commented Apr 16, 2025

Based on #14616

Extends rename_lint to handle more cases and makes update_lints sort deprecated_lints.rs.

changelog: None

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 16, 2025

r? @samueltardieu

rustbot has assigned @samueltardieu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Apr 16, 2025
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@samueltardieu
Copy link
Contributor

Since it's waiting on #13223 and I'll be AFK for a while, reassigning similarly to #13223
r? @flip1995

@Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jarcho commented Apr 24, 2025

Since @flip1995 is busy r? clippy

@rustbot rustbot assigned y21 and unassigned flip1995 Apr 24, 2025
@Jarcho Jarcho added the S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work label Apr 24, 2025
Jarcho added 3 commits May 16, 2025 06:20
* rename test files inside directories and ui-toml tests
* rename tests prefixed with the lint's name
* better module path renaming when renaming the lint's module
* partially delete lint files when uplifting
* rename ui_test error markers
@Jarcho Jarcho removed the S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work label May 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@samueltardieu samueltardieu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, also tested it and it seems to work as expected.

@samueltardieu samueltardieu added this pull request to the merge queue May 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 604b7b0 May 16, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants