Skip to content

Conversation

Alexendoo
Copy link
Member

Fixes a common nit

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 18, 2024

r? @dswij

rustbot has assigned @dswij.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Mar 18, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #12511) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Alexendoo Alexendoo force-pushed the unused-qualifications branch from e2e60e9 to c5a9e65 Compare March 20, 2024 13:54
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #12516) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Alexendoo Alexendoo force-pushed the unused-qualifications branch from c5a9e65 to a24d12b Compare March 22, 2024 16:06
@Alexendoo
Copy link
Member Author

Gonna queue this one up since it's very conflicty

@bors r=dswij p=1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 22, 2024

📌 Commit a24d12b has been approved by dswij

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 22, 2024

⌛ Testing commit a24d12b with merge 44a5eda...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 22, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: dswij
Pushing 44a5eda to master...

@bors bors merged commit 44a5eda into rust-lang:master Mar 22, 2024
@Alexendoo Alexendoo deleted the unused-qualifications branch March 22, 2024 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants