Closed
Description
Summary
We run clippy checks as part of our CI workflow in the esp-hal project. We have been using the nightly release channel for various reasons, and this has largely not been a problem over the last couple of years.
As of yesterday (2024-02-26) this ICE has reared its head. I had expected this to be resolved with a new nightly release, as has usually been the case in the rare cases we encounter problems like this, however we are still experiencing this ICE.
The most recent workflow run (as of time of writing) can be seen failing here:
https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-hal/actions/runs/8066109592/job/22033416529
I apologize, I am unable to provide a minimal verifiable example at this time; if my schedule clears up this week perhaps I can look into it, but can't make any promises.
Version
rustc 1.78.0-nightly (fc3800f65 2024-02-26)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: fc3800f65777a365b5125706d60f97e4d0675efe
commit-date: 2024-02-26
host: x86_64-apple-darwin
release: 1.78.0-nightly
LLVM version: 18.1.0
Error output
Backtrace
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:565:9:
assertion failed: self.stashed_diagnostics.is_empty()
stack backtrace:
0: _rust_begin_unwind
1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
2: core::panicking::panic
3: <rustc_errors::DiagCtxtInner as core::ops::drop::Drop>::drop
4: core::ptr::drop_in_place::<rustc_errors::DiagCtxt>
5: core::ptr::drop_in_place::<rustc_session::parse::ParseSess>
6: <scoped_tls::ScopedKey<rustc_span::SessionGlobals>>::set::<clippy_lints::doc::needless_doctest_main::check::check_code_sample::{closure#0}::{closure#0}, (bool, alloc::vec::Vec<core::ops::range::Range<usize>>)>
7: rustc_span::create_session_globals_then::<(bool, alloc::vec::Vec<core::ops::range::Range<usize>>), clippy_lints::doc::needless_doctest_main::check::check_code_sample::{closure#0}::{closure#0}>
8: rustc_driver_impl::catch_fatal_errors::<clippy_lints::doc::needless_doctest_main::check::check_code_sample::{closure#0}, (bool, alloc::vec::Vec<core::ops::range::Range<usize>>)>
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
error: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.
note: we would appreciate a bug report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/new?template=ice.yml
note: please attach the file at `/Users/jesse/Work/esp-hal/esp-hal/rustc-ice-2024-02-27T14_29_42-23311.txt` to your bug report
note: compiler flags: --crate-type lib -C embed-bitcode=no -C debuginfo=2 -C incremental=[REDACTED]
note: some of the compiler flags provided by cargo are hidden
query stack during panic:
end of query stack
note: Clippy version: clippy 0.1.78 (fc3800f6 2024-02-26)
thread 'rustc' panicked at src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/doc/needless_doctest_main.rs:125:10:
thread::spawn failed: Any { .. }
stack backtrace:
0: _rust_begin_unwind
1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
2: core::result::unwrap_failed
3: clippy_lints::doc::check_attrs
4: <clippy_lints::doc::Documentation as rustc_lint::passes::LateLintPass>::check_item
5: <rustc_lint::late::LateContextAndPass<rustc_lint::late::RuntimeCombinedLateLintPass> as rustc_hir::intravisit::Visitor>::visit_nested_item
6: rustc_lint::late::late_lint_crate
7: std::panicking::try::<(), core::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<rustc_lint::late::check_crate::{closure#0}>>
8: rustc_data_structures::sync::parallel::disabled::join::<rustc_lint::late::check_crate::{closure#0}, rustc_lint::late::check_crate::{closure#1}, (), ()>
9: rustc_lint::late::check_crate
10: std::panicking::try::<(), core::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<rustc_interface::passes::analysis::{closure#6}::{closure#1}::{closure#0}::{closure#1}::{closure#0}::{closure#3}::{closure#0}>>
11: <rustc_data_structures::sync::parallel::ParallelGuard>::run::<(), rustc_interface::passes::analysis::{closure#6}::{closure#1}::{closure#0}::{closure#0}::{closure#2}>
12: std::panicking::try::<(), core::panic::unwind_safe::AssertUnwindSafe<rustc_interface::passes::analysis::{closure#6}::{closure#1}::{closure#0}>>
13: <rustc_data_structures::sync::parallel::ParallelGuard>::run::<(), rustc_interface::passes::analysis::{closure#6}::{closure#1}::{closure#0}>
14: <rustc_session::session::Session>::time::<(), rustc_interface::passes::analysis::{closure#6}>
15: rustc_interface::passes::analysis
[... omitted 2 frames ...]
16: <rustc_middle::ty::context::GlobalCtxt>::enter::<rustc_driver_impl::run_compiler::{closure#0}::{closure#1}::{closure#3}, core::result::Result<(), rustc_span::ErrorGuaranteed>>
17: <rustc_interface::interface::Compiler>::enter::<rustc_driver_impl::run_compiler::{closure#0}::{closure#1}, core::result::Result<core::option::Option<rustc_interface::queries::Linker>, rustc_span::ErrorGuaranteed>>
18: rustc_span::set_source_map::<core::result::Result<(), rustc_span::ErrorGuaranteed>, rustc_interface::interface::run_compiler<core::result::Result<(), rustc_span::ErrorGuaranteed>, rustc_driver_impl::run_compiler::{closure#0}>::{closure#0}::{closure#0}>
19: rustc_span::create_session_globals_then::<core::result::Result<(), rustc_span::ErrorGuaranteed>, rustc_interface::util::run_in_thread_pool_with_globals<rustc_interface::interface::run_compiler<core::result::Result<(), rustc_span::ErrorGuaranteed>, rustc_driver_impl::run_compiler::{closure#0}>::{closure#0}, core::result::Result<(), rustc_span::ErrorGuaranteed>>::{closure#0}>
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
error: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.
note: we would appreciate a bug report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/new?template=ice.yml
note: please attach the file at `/Users/jesse/Work/esp-hal/esp-hal/rustc-ice-2024-02-27T14_29_42-23311.txt` to your bug report
note: compiler flags: --crate-type lib -C embed-bitcode=no -C debuginfo=2 -C incremental=[REDACTED]
note: some of the compiler flags provided by cargo are hidden
query stack during panic:
#0 [analysis] running analysis passes on this crate
end of query stack
note: Clippy version: clippy 0.1.78 (fc3800f6 2024-02-26)
error: could not compile `esp-hal` (lib)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment