Skip to content

feat: Support the ${concat(...)} metavariable expression #18151

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

ChayimFriedman2
Copy link
Contributor

I didn't follow rustc precisely, because I think it does some things wrongly (or they are FIXME), but I only allowed more code, not less. So we're all fine.

Closes #18145.

I didn't follow rustc precisely, because I think it does some things wrongly (or they are FIXME), but I only allowed more code, not less. So we're all fine.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 19, 2024
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Sep 20, 2024

Thanks!
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2024

📌 Commit 8a50aec has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8a50aec with merge d4689f1...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 20, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing d4689f1 to master...

@bors bors merged commit d4689f1 into rust-lang:master Sep 20, 2024
11 checks passed
@ChayimFriedman2 ChayimFriedman2 deleted the metavar-concat branch October 6, 2024 22:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for macro_metavar_expr_concat
4 participants