Update 2495-min-rust-version.md links

[chris-ha458]

the PR and issue have been updated with different semantics

Rendered

[ehuss]

I would lean towards not approving this since we generally have a policy of not updating RFCs after they are merged. Almost all RFCs go through at least some minor changes during the implementation and stabilization phases, and those changes are almost never reflected back into the RFC. The updated information exists in the documentation, and we don't expect RFCs to be a reference source or living documents. They are a snapshot of the decision made at the time it was approved. I would prefer not to give the illusion that the RFC documents are up-to-date, because then we would need to review/change the entire RFC.

EDIT: But thank you for taking a look at trying to update this.

[chris-ha458]

I understand what you are saying.
Many people still refer the that RFC for as a reference, partially because that is the highest google search result.
I guess this is something we can or should fix by a PR like this.

Just for posterity, at least for MSRV, where would be the de facto reference that is also up to date?
I tried searching for MSRV or Minimum Supported Rust Version in https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference/
but I have not found a satisfactory reference.

Is it expected for users and developers to carefully read through the relevant links and discover the most authoritative data like I have?
I guess that is a reasonable expectation from the developer side, but also I fear that some people might not do the necessary legwork (a pitfall that I initially fell into, and was trying to prevent)