Skip to content

Should Miri report MIR validation failures? #2840

Closed
@cbeuw

Description

@cbeuw

rustc contains a MIR validation pass which detects ill-formed MIR. Currently Miri does not report MIR validation failures, but should it?

For instance, in runtime MIR, Deref must the the first projection if one exists. This code (rust-lang/rust#110228) performs a dereference after a field projection, so it fails MIR validation, but Miri runs this without any complaint

#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics)]
extern crate core;
use core::intrinsics::mir::*;
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "optimized")]
pub fn fn0() {
    mir! {
        let x: i32;
        let tuple: (*mut i32,);
        {
            tuple.0 = core::ptr::addr_of_mut!(x);
            *(tuple.0) = 1;
            Return()
        }
    }
}
pub fn main() {
    fn0();
}

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions