Skip to content

Conversation

nathanwhit
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #615.

Copy link
Member

@jackh726 jackh726 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, I think. Want a second look from @nikomatsakis though.

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

Also, my PR broke the links in the book. I'll make a PR for that separately.

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

jackh726 commented Oct 3, 2020

This looks right and Niko didn't get to it this week. I don't want this issue to block the rustc PR, so I'm going to merge this so it gets into next release.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 3, 2020

📌 Commit 2ee1c9d has been approved by jackh726

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 3, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 2ee1c9d with merge c74da51...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 3, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jackh726
Pushing c74da51 to master...

@bors bors merged commit c74da51 into rust-lang:master Oct 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement clauses to allow multi-parameter fundamental types
3 participants