docs(ref): Rename DEP_NAME_KEY to DEP_LINKS_KEY #16205
Merged
+3
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`NAME` is unclear what should go here and the docs have to specifically call out that it is `package.links` and not `package.name`. The hope with this rename is to make this even clearer, especially if we move forward with rust-lang#3544 and add an alternative to `DEP_NAME_KEY` that uses the dependency name.
rustbot
added
A-documenting-cargo-itself
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
weihanglo
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2025
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2025
Update cargo submodule 22 commits in 6368002885a04cbeae39a82cf5118f941559a40a..445fe4a68f469bf936b2fd81de2c503b233a7f4f 2025-10-31 14:31:52 +0000 to 2025-11-07 18:08:19 +0000 - fix(depinfo): prevent invalid trailing backslash on Windows (rust-lang/cargo#16223) - refactor: Remove lazycell (rust-lang/cargo#16224) - refactor: extract ConfigValue to its own module (rust-lang/cargo#16222) - fix(config): non-mergeable list from cli should take priority (rust-lang/cargo#16220) - fix(compile): build.warnings=deny shouldn't block hard warnings (rust-lang/cargo#16213) - fix: display absolute path in the `missing in PATH` warning (rust-lang/cargo#16125) - fix: non-mergeable list from config cli merge the same way (rust-lang/cargo#16219) - docs(contrib): Link out to rustc diagnostic style guide (rust-lang/cargo#16216) - fix: Remove build-plan (rust-lang/cargo#16212) - Add native completions for `--package` on various commands (rust-lang/cargo#16210) - fix(completions): don't wrap completion item help in parenthesis (rust-lang/cargo#16215) - refactor(locking): Make disabling locking on NFS mounts explicit (rust-lang/cargo#16177) - docs(unstable): Move compile-time-deps out of Stabilized section (rust-lang/cargo#16211) - docs(ref): Rename DEP_NAME_KEY to DEP_LINKS_KEY (rust-lang/cargo#16205) - feat(build-analysis): emit rebuild reason log entry (rust-lang/cargo#16203) - chore: Update dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#16200) - chore(deps): update cargo-semver-checks to v0.45.0 (rust-lang/cargo#16190) - chore(deps): update msrv (rust-lang/cargo#16178) - refactor: embed deserialize validation logic in ProgressConfig (rust-lang/cargo#16194) - refactor(gctx): extract config schema to a module (rust-lang/cargo#16195) - chore: bump to 0.94.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#16191) - chore(deps): update rust crate gix to 0.74.0 (rust-lang/cargo#16186) r? ghost
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2025
Update cargo submodule 22 commits in 6368002885a04cbeae39a82cf5118f941559a40a..445fe4a68f469bf936b2fd81de2c503b233a7f4f 2025-10-31 14:31:52 +0000 to 2025-11-07 18:08:19 +0000 - fix(depinfo): prevent invalid trailing backslash on Windows (rust-lang/cargo#16223) - refactor: Remove lazycell (rust-lang/cargo#16224) - refactor: extract ConfigValue to its own module (rust-lang/cargo#16222) - fix(config): non-mergeable list from cli should take priority (rust-lang/cargo#16220) - fix(compile): build.warnings=deny shouldn't block hard warnings (rust-lang/cargo#16213) - fix: display absolute path in the `missing in PATH` warning (rust-lang/cargo#16125) - fix: non-mergeable list from config cli merge the same way (rust-lang/cargo#16219) - docs(contrib): Link out to rustc diagnostic style guide (rust-lang/cargo#16216) - fix: Remove build-plan (rust-lang/cargo#16212) - Add native completions for `--package` on various commands (rust-lang/cargo#16210) - fix(completions): don't wrap completion item help in parenthesis (rust-lang/cargo#16215) - refactor(locking): Make disabling locking on NFS mounts explicit (rust-lang/cargo#16177) - docs(unstable): Move compile-time-deps out of Stabilized section (rust-lang/cargo#16211) - docs(ref): Rename DEP_NAME_KEY to DEP_LINKS_KEY (rust-lang/cargo#16205) - feat(build-analysis): emit rebuild reason log entry (rust-lang/cargo#16203) - chore: Update dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#16200) - chore(deps): update cargo-semver-checks to v0.45.0 (rust-lang/cargo#16190) - chore(deps): update msrv (rust-lang/cargo#16178) - refactor: embed deserialize validation logic in ProgressConfig (rust-lang/cargo#16194) - refactor(gctx): extract config schema to a module (rust-lang/cargo#16195) - chore: bump to 0.94.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#16191) - chore(deps): update rust crate gix to 0.74.0 (rust-lang/cargo#16186) r? ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
NAMEis unclear what should go here and the docs have to specifically call out that it ispackage.linksand notpackage.name. The hope with this rename is to make this even clearer, especially if we move forward with #3544 and add an alternative toDEP_NAME_KEYthat uses the dependency name.How to test and review this PR?