Skip to content

Conversation

weihanglo
Copy link
Member

@weihanglo weihanglo commented Feb 23, 2025

Beta backports

In order to make CI pass, the following PRs are also cherry-picked:

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 23, 2025

r? @epage

rustbot has assigned @epage.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 23, 2025

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against rust-1.86.0. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Feb 23, 2025

Hm, don't know what the CI error for compatible_with_older_cargo is about.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member Author

Should be fixed now!

@ehuss ehuss merged commit fcb465c into rust-lang:rust-1.86.0 Feb 23, 2025
22 of 23 checks passed
@weihanglo weihanglo deleted the beta-1.86.0-backport branch February 23, 2025 16:45
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2025
…nglo

[beta-1.86] Update cargo

1 commits in ce948f4616e3d4277e30c75c8bb01e094910df39..fcb465caf719e68f05671947db75a66ca7fadb2a
2025-02-14 20:32:07 +0000 to 2025-02-23 08:30:05 -0800
- [beta-1.86] depend on openssl-sys to correctly pin its version (rust-lang/cargo#15226)
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants